|
 |
Townhall...
The US Should Follow
Europe’s Lead
By Paul Driessen
President Obama and environmentalists often say America should follow
Europe’s lead on energy, climate and economic matters.
Recent events suggest that we should listen more attentively to the
Europeans.
Two brutal winters have awakened Europe to the fact that global
temperatures stopped rising in 1998 – and that frigid days and nights
pose far graver dangers to the elderly and poor than warm weather and
moderate global warming.
Germany and the Netherlands were gripped by near-record lows this past
winter. People suffered frostbite and some froze to death in Poland and
Russia.
Barely twelve months after its Meteorological Office said the 2009-10
winter was the coldest in three decades, Britain endured its coldest
December-January since 1683. Because the United Kingdom’s ultra green
energy policies have driven heating costs into the stratosphere,
British pensioners rode buses or spent all day in libraries to stay
warm, then shivered all night in their apartments. Tens of thousands
risked hypothermia, trying to control costs by bundling up and turning
the heat down or off. Many died.
In Wales, a third of all children live in low-income households, and a
quarter of all households were in “fuel poverty” – forced to spend at
least 10% of their income on heating. Many parents had to choose
between keeping their children warm and providing them with nourishing
meals, welfare workers said. Many Welsh children couldn’t sleep at
night because of the cold, damaging their health and grades.
This isn’t proof that the world is entering a global cooling cycle. But
the absence of sunspots is the most prolonged in a century, and
scientists say the reduced solar activity is reminiscent of the Maunder
Minimum, between 1645 and 1715, when the Northern Hemisphere suffered
through the coldest weather, worst storms and shortest growing seasons
of the Little Ice Age.
The frigid weather, freezing families, record budget deficits, soaring
unemployment – and complete failure of global warming computer models
to predict anything other than “a warmer than normal winter” – have
caused a meltdown in Europe’s longstanding climate and energy policies.
In fact, many Europeans increasingly recognize that businesses,
hospitals and especially poor families absolutely need reliable,
affordable energy – which wind and solar cannot provide.
The British government is looking into cutting subsidies, feed-in
tariffs and other incentives for solar projects, to prevent the
boom-and-bust seen in Spain and predicted for the Czech Republic. Wind
turbines, small hydroelectric plants and biomass projects are also on
the block, as the government attempts to revive the UK economy, raise
its competitiveness, radically reduce rising debt burdens, and chart a
more economically and politically realistic course.
United Kingdom manufacturers say “green energy” policies and increased
penalties for using fossil fuels are raising their costs to intolerable
levels, especially for energy-intensive industries. Manufacturing is
“reaching a tipping point,” they say, “where companies that are
internationally mobile will say ‘enough is enough,’” and simply move to
Asia. Millions of jobs are on the line.
The Netherlands is likewise reducing its renewable energy targets and
slashing wind and solar subsidies. More shocking, even in the wake of
Fukushima, the Dutch are talking of approving their first new nuclear
power plant in 40 years, because they can no longer afford to pay
exorbitant fees for minimal amounts of renewable electricity (that is
well below theoretically “rated” or “capacity” output).
Poland is racing to develop shale gas, using hydraulic fracturing
methods developed by American companies to unlock trillions of cubic
feet of methane for its homes and factories. Exploratory drilling is
also underway, or about to begin, in Britain, Germany and other
countries, as engineers evaluate the extent and economics of developing
their own vast shale gas deposits.
In Slovakia, the government stopped issuing solar licenses barely six
months after launching its program. After unaffordable subsidies were
sharply reduced, new solar installations in the Czech Republic fell 76%
(from 2800 MW in 2009 to 400 MW in 2010); in Spain they plummeted 98%
(from 2800 MW to 69 MW between 2008 and 2009). Private investments in
these government-supported programs also cratered.
France and other countries are taking similar steps, while also
expanding coal-based electricity, to replace nuclear.
“Austerity-whacked Europe is rolling back subsidies for renewable
energy, as economic sanity makes a tentative comeback,” London Globe
and Mail columnist Eric Reguly observed. “Green energy is becoming
unaffordable and may cost as many jobs as it creates.” Or worse.
A new report from Scotland found that renewable energy kills 3.7
traditional jobs for every “green” job it creates. Wind power mandates
also cost British energy consumers an extra $1.8 billion in higher
electricity costs in 2009-2010. Rebellion is in the air, and belief in
dangerous manmade global warming has plummeted.
European Energy Commissioner Gunter Oettinger put it bluntly. “If we go
alone to 30% [renewable energy],” he said, “you will have a faster
process of de-industrialization in Europe. We need industry, and
industry means CO2 emissions.” Tougher climate and renewable targets
will force industries to move to Asia, he added, and steel will likely
be one of the first casualties. Europe can no longer afford to “prop
up” renewable energy industries.
However, despite these changes in the Europe he extols so often,
President Obama says this is America’s “Sputnik moment.” He wants the
United States to “invest” in “the Apollo projects of our time” –
spending countless billions of additional taxpayer dollars to
“stimulate” renewable energy, high-speed rail, climate change
“prevention” and other projects. His April 13 budget speech reiterated
this commitment.
This is precisely the kind of business-as-usual our nation can no
longer afford: politicians and bureaucrats deciding which energy
technologies, industries and companies win – and which ones lose – on
the basis of politics, rather than science, economics or technology.
It is time to follow Europe’s lead. We may not be able to do anything
about the weather or climate. But we can, and must, implement policies
that ensure we have the technology and money to adapt to whatever
climate and weather changes might come.
Developing America’s vast domestic oil, natural gas, coal and shale gas
deposits will generate millions of jobs and hundreds of billions of
dollars in critically needed royalty and tax revenue. We must ensure
that our energy policies generate revenues and create jobs – instead of
requiring constant taxpayer subsidies and destroying two to four
traditional jobs for every “green” job that government “creates.”
We need to do that, and can do it without hurting the environmental
values we all cherish.
Any policies that shackle our ability to follow this new Europe-advised
course will severely harm our nation’s future – and shackle blue-collar
jobs, poor families and minority opportunities worst of all.
Read it at Townhall
|
|
|
|
