Human
Events...
Holder
Threatened With Impeachment,
Contempt in Fast and Furious Probe
by Audrey Hudson
12/08/2011
Attorney
General Eric Holder admitted
on Thursday that e-mails from his computer were withheld from a
congressional
investigation into Operation Fast and Furious, angering lawmakers who
threatened the nation’s top cop with impeachment and contempt charges.
“These
are materials we have not and
will not produce,” Holder testified during the combative day-long
hearing
before the House Judiciary Committee.
Rep.
Darrell Issa (R.-Calif.) compared
Holder to disgraced Attorney General John Mitchell of Watergate infamy,
as he
threatened to bring contempt charges against him for refusing to
divulge the
documents.
“Have
you no shame?” Holder snapped at
Issa, likening the questioning to Sen. Joe McCarthy’s hearings held to
expose
Communists in the ‘50s.
Issa
criticized Holder for dodging any
blame in the operation’s failure, and demanded that everyone implicated
in the
matter be terminated.
“I
have no confidence in a President
who has full confidence in an attorney general who has in fact not
terminated,”
or reprimanded, department officials involved, Issa said.
Rep.
James Sensenbrenner (R.-Wis.)
suggested impeachment is lawmakers’ only remaining option for Holder if
he
continues to withhold information.
Still
Holder insisted he knew nothing about Fast and Furious until months
after the
death of a federal agent.
“The
wagons down the street are in a
pretty tight circle, Mr. Attorney General,” Sensenbrenner said. “The American people need
the truth. They
haven’t gotten the truth from what has
been coming out of the Justice Department in the last year, and they
are
relying on Congress to get the truth.
The answers that you have given so far, are
basically saying somebody
else did it.”
“The
thing is, if we don’t get to the
bottom of this, and that requires your assistance on that, there is
only one
alternative that Congress has. And it is called impeachment,”
Sensenbrenner
said.
Nearly
50 Republican lawmakers have
called for Holder’s resignation because of Fast and Furious, an
operation by
the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) that
promoted the
sale of guns in an effort to track the weapons to Mexican drug cartels. However, government
officials lost track of
some 2,000 weapons, and the operation was canceled after two guns were
used in
the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.
“I
have no intention of resigning,”
Holder told the panel. “I’m
the attorney
general who put an end to these misguided tactics in Fast and Furious
when I
found out about them.”
At
the heart of the congressional
investigation is an attempt to determine exactly when Holder and other
top
government officials first learned about the operation that began in
2009 and
ended after Terry’s death in December 2010, and whether there has been
a
coverup of that knowledge.
Holder
told lawmakers during a May
hearing that he was not informed about the operation until a few weeks
prior,
but said yesterday that he asked the Justice Department’s inspector
general in
February to investigate the matter.
“A
couple of months might have been
more precise, but a couple of weeks is still accurate,” Holder said.
Numerous
murders in Mexico have been
linked to the guns, the sales of which were sanctioned by federal
officials
through U.S. dealers, and Holder predicted that more deaths are likely.
“Although
the Department has taken
steps to ensure that such tactics are never used again, it is an
unfortunate
reality that we will continue to feel the effects of this flawed
operation for
years to come,” Holder said. “Guns
lost
during this operation will continue to show up at crime scenes on both
sides of
the border.”
Holder
told the panel that there has
been an indictment in the murder of Terry, but that it remains sealed,
and he
declined to discuss it further.
Holder
disputed accusations that a top
aide deliberately lied in a letter to Congress that the gun sales were
sanctioned,
and the weapons were allowed to “walk” across the border to Mexico.
“Tell
me, what’s the difference
between lying and misleading Congress, in this context?” Sensenbrenner
asked. “Obviously
there have been
statements so misleading that a letter had to be withdrawn.”
Responded
Holder: “Well, if
you want to have this legal
conversation, it all has to do with your state of mind, and whether or
not you
had the requisite intent to come up with something that would be
considered
perjury or a lie. The
information that
was provided by the Feb. 4 letter was gleaned by the people who drafted
the
letter after they interacted with people who they thought were in the
best
position to have the information.”
Republican
lawmakers also criticized
the agency for using the tragedy and the sanctioned sale of guns to
build a
case for tracking the purchases of all long guns sold in the U.S.,
which CBS
News revealed Wednesday through e-mails they obtained from the ATF.
“You
ought not to use your screwup as
a basis to extend your authority,” said Rep. Dan Lungren (R.-Calif.).
Holder
defended the action as a lesson
learned from Fast and Furious that the agency lacked “effective
enforcement
tools” to stem the flow of guns from the U.S. to Mexico.
“Going
forward, I hope that we can
work together to provide law enforcement agents with the tools they
desperately
need to protect the country and ensure their own safety,” Holder said. “For their sake, we cannot
afford to allow
the tragic mistakes of Operation Fast and Furious to become a political
sideshow or a series of media opportunities.”
Numerous
Democratic lawmakers say the
registration of long guns is a reasonable measure, and have told Holder
they
support his efforts.
Read
this and other columns at Human
Events
|