|
Redstate...
Obama Administration
Covering Up Abortion Data
What are they trying to
hide?
Posted by Erick Erickson
Thursday, February 3rd
Let’s be clear: promoting science isn’t just about providing resources
– it is also about protecting free and open inquiry. It is about
letting scientists … do their jobs, free from manipulation or coercion,
and listening to what they tell us, even when it’s inconvenient –
especially when it’s inconvenient. It is about ensuring that scientific
data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda – and
that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology.
-President Obama, March 9, 2009.
“The Obama Administration has apparently ordered that the only Federal
government report on abortion statistics … be deep-sixed. ”
RedState has uncovered evidence - confirmed by the CDC’s own press
office - that the Obama administration is deliberately playing “hide
the ball” on nationwide abortion statistics. For apparently the first
time in 40 years, the CDC’s annual “Abortion Surveillance Report” was
not published, and there are “no plans” for the data to be produced at
this time.
Whatever you feel about abortion and its legality, virtually all people
agree that transparency and factual accuracy are important in the
abortion debate. That is why even Planned Parenthood spends a
substantial amount of money each year funding the Guttmacher
Institute’s studies on abortion statistics. While pro-life groups have
long contended that Guttmacher’s methods systematically undercount
abortions, that is beside the point; the Guttmacher studies have long
provided a consistent source for studying abortion trends over time.
Which aggregate data, we re-emphasize, is important not only for both
sides of the idealogical debate, but is also important medical
information.
[Editorial Note: The Guttmacher Institute emailed that Planned
Parenthood does not fund it. Planned Parenthood set up the Guttmacher
Institute as its research arm and Guttmacher claims it is now
independent of Planned Parenthood. Apparently, Planned Parenthood does
not have to fund Guttmacher, because you and I do.]
Yet, in the wake of numerous damaging disclosures about unscrupulous
practices by abortionists (from Kermit Gosnell to Planned Parenthood
clinics across the country), the Obama Administration has apparently
ordered that the only Federal government report on abortion statistics
– again, a report that has run continuously for 40 years – be
deep-sixed. The immediate question this raises is: what is the Obama
administration trying to hide?
Here’s the background: Beginning in 1969 the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention collected data on legal abortions carried out in
the United States through its Abortion Surveillance System. The report
based on this data ordinarily appeared as an article in CDC’s
professional journal, The Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report (MMWR)
the week after Thanksgiving. The report lagged the data by three years,
i.e., the 2006 data were printed in 2009.
The report was produced by the cooperative efforts of the Guttmacher
Institute and statisticians at the CDC.
The report has never been all-encompassing because collecting data on
abortions is a state function, and not every state cooperates. In the
2006 reports, California, Louisiana, and New Hampshire did not provide
data. Until 2005, Alaska and Oklahoma also declined to participate.
While not comprehensive, the CDC report provided the best single
estimate of abortions in the US, as well as providing detailed
breakdowns: the age of the baby at the time of abortion, age of the
mother, number of abortions the mother had previous to the current one,
etc. People on both sides of the abortion debate have cited these
statistics to make their points. Here at RedState, we frequently posted
articles on this report, examining the statistical trends on abortion.
We were particularly interested in this year’s report in light of the
widely publicized stories indicating that over 40% of pregnancies in
New York City are ended by abortion.
Last year, contrary to the long-established practice, November came and
went with no report posted on the CDC’s website. Over the following
weeks, multiple visits to the site proved fruitless. The possibility
the report was not merely delayed, but had in fact been axed from
higher up, had to be considered.
Last week, RedState began investigating by calling those in DC who
might have some answers. After several attempts, we finally received
confirmation from Rhonda Smith at the CDC’s press office in Atlanta
that the report has been buried indefinitely; the CDC “will not have
stats available at any time in the near future” and there “are no plans
for them to come out any time soon.” This call took place on Jan. 27th,
and we asked Ms. Smith for a reason that the report wouldn’t be issued
anymore. She promised to check around and find out if there was any
reason given and get back to us – as of the date of this posting, we
have received no further communication from her office.
This revelation is nothing short of shocking. Most of the leg work for
this study is actually done by Guttmacher – all it costs the CDC is
some manpower to assemble the statistics and write up the report. In
the overall scope of the CDC’s budget, this report barely even
registers. So what is the CDC trying to hide? The only reasonable
conclusion to be drawn here is that someone higher up has made the
decision to actively eliminate the only official report on abortion
statistics in the country, just because they don’t want abortion being
talked about.
This action is indefensible and contrary to the Obama administration’s
repeated promises of transparency and the removal of politics from
accurate scientific reporting. And it is more damning than any report:
it reflects the reality that the Obama Administration is afraid of the
truth, afraid that the American people cannot be trusted to support
legal abortion if they look closely at the facts.
Suppression of this nature doesn’t have to stand. A senate aide tells
RedState that if the administration or the CDC are stonewalling on
this, “Congress would have a range of options to force them to disclose
this information including hearings, letters and floor amendments.”
We urge Congress to investigate this apparent cover-up. Transparency
and consistency are not a partisan issue. The CDC report is objective
statistical data that should be produced regardless of any potential
political implications.
UPDATE: Congresswoman Vicky Hartzler (MO-4) has provided RedState with
the following statement:
“This is the epitome of hypocrisy being exhibited by the Obama
Administration as it hides facts and figures on abortion while claiming
to want more transparency in government. This is a pattern that has
become all too common with the Obama Administration, ranging from its
distortion of the facts on taxpayer funding of abortions under
ObamaCare to manipulated information to support repeal of the
military’s Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy. It is time for the Obama White
House to put a stop to its disregard for openness in government and to
end its practice of distorting data for blatantly political purposes.”
Read the article, with links, at Redstate.com...
|
|
|
|
