Redstate...
The
EPA Must Be Stopped, and I’m Not
Talking About Light Bulbs
Posted by Ben Howe
Thursday, July 14th
There’s
been a lot of talk these days
about light bulbs. The
Hill is reporting
on how it’s shedding light on the “new Republican party,” one that is
so “out
of touch with the mainstream” because it only listens to it’s
“extremist
elements.” The New
York Times has
declared victory for the green movement, while some in the blogosphere
have
taken to referring to the bulb issue as a “fatal conceit,” referring to
the
White House’s fulfillment of Hayek’s description.
The
issue has taken hold in the press
as to be about light bulbs, which of course reasonable people know is
an unfair
characterization of a complicated issue.
The real issue is obviously freedom.
Freedom to make choices, no matter how
insignificant they may seem. The
light bulb situation is an example of
that debate, but I’m starting to believe it is becoming a distraction. You don’t even have to
travel far from the
realm of light bulbs to see that our overly regulated lives are about
to be far
more restricted and the impact will be devestating.
Recently,
the EPA released it’s Clean
Air Transit Rule (CATR) under the name “The Cross Air Pollution Rule.” This essentially requires
states that have
power plants to redue emissions they produce which are carried downwind
to
neighboring states. CATR
is widely
expected to result in massive closures or temporary shutdowns of
electric
plants.
Via
Mineweb.com:
“The
EPA is ignoring the cumulative
economic damage new regulations will cause,” said Steve Miller, CEO of
the
coalition. “America’s coal-fuelled electric industry has been doing its
part
for the environment and the economy, but our industry needs adequate
time to
install clean coal technologies to comply with new regulations.”
Kathleen
White at National Review
calls the regulation an “economy killer.”
EPA’s
hazy precautionary analysis is
its justification for destroying the lignite-mining industry in Texas —
jettisoning 11 percent of the state’s electric generation, destroying
more than
2,500 jobs directly and some 10,000 more indirectly in the
lignite-mining
industry, and forfeiting $2.4 billion in annual expenditures by the
lignite-coal industry – the tax base for many Texas communities. The
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) told EPA that
the new
rule could destroy the jobs of 1,500 IBEW members working at six power
plants
in Texas.
The
House is working on a stop to this
with an appropriations bill that would cut EPA funding and delay the
implementation of these rules, but of course there is an effort by the
Congressional Democrats to dismantle the bill citing “environmental
concerns.”
But
CATR is far from the only concern
to find it’s way out of the EPA. The
NAT
GAS Act (New Alternative Transportation to Give Americans Solutions)
would give
loopholes subsidies tax credits to natural gas vehicle producers and
consumers. It’s the
old adage from Ronald Reagan: If it
moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving,
subsidize it. I’m
sure that no harm
could possibly come from yet more subsidization of methods of energy
that can’t
compete directly against oil. After
all,
it’s worked out so well in the past.
If
you think the EPA is done finding
ways beyond your light bulb to mess up the economy and infringe on your
freedom, you are mistaken. In
it’s never
ending quest to destroy all market based affordable fuel sources, the
EPA is
following the commands of the Commander in Chief in an attempt to
bankrupt the
coal industry.
Via
Jazz Shaw at Hot Air:
Even
though cap and trade went down in
flames through legal routes, as The American Legislative Exchange
reports, the
commission has been using extra-legislative procedures, cloaked under
the guise
of the Clean Air Act, to to effectively declare war on the American
coal
industry. What
kind of extra legislative measures? Well rather than instituting
realistic measure that might help ensure sensible coal production
standards, the administration wants to use the proposed MACT (Utility
Maximum Achievable Control Technology) rules.
According to the Bi-partisan Policy Center, MACT is:
a “rule [that] requires coal and oil-fired power plants to reduce
emissions of mercury, other metallic toxics, acid gases, and organic
air toxics.”
According to Congressman John Sullivan (R) Vice Chair of the sub-committee on Energy & Power:
“The Utility MACT rule has the potential to be one of the most
expensive and burdensome regulations the EPA has ever put forward – its
going to directly impact 24% of our nation’s electricity generation
resulting in higher energy bills for American families and businesses”,
added Sullivan. “Utility MACT and the final transport rule are
great examples of the EPA doing too much too fast with no regard for
the economic consequences of their regulatory agenda.”
And just in case one might claim that my documented doubts about
climate change, and my penchant for disliking anything this president
does, are having an effect on my objectivity, a new independent study
just released last month proves that proposed acts like CATR and MACT
will absolutely cost American jobs. The common response from
Democrats is “yes but it will create green jobs!!” Yes, Democrat
predictions of job creation has worked out so well so far.
Besides, the effects are already rearing their ugly heads.
Power giant Liminant filed an 8-k with the SEC last night, basically
saying that the reductions the EPA (outlined in CATR) has mandated in 6
months are not possible and will result in both paper losses
immediately on the value of their SO2 trading allowances. But
more importantly, they’ve indicated that they may have to shut down
plants in order to comply with the 47% reduction of SO2 emissions the
EPA has mandated in a 6 month time period (Jan 1, 2012 effective
date). That timeline is simply not achievable. Luminant’s
owner has said the same publicly, acknowledging that they may have to
“mothball” some of their operations to comply.
While there are some reasons to be optimistic that the good fight is
still being had, one thing has become abundantly clear: this
administration and it’s green dreams are not interested in our little
light bulb tiff. For them, it’s just a distraction from what’s
really going on. And what’s really going on is that the EPA is
back-dooring cap-n-trade. The administration is bypassing the
Congress. Our economy, our jobs, our way of lives are truly under
attack.
The EPA must be stopped.
Read it at Redstate
|