Editor:
It’s not often that Townhall
Finance graces our pages, and this is a first from Lincoln Brown. If
anyone is
listening, it should be a message about how the American people are
responding
to the Obama agenda.
Townhall
Finance...
How
Obama Saves/Creates Jobs: Replace
High-Paying Energy Jobs with Low-Paying Housekeeping Jobs
By Lincoln Brown
7/25/11
I
suppose I should jump for joy and
shout to the rafters. After all Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar
has decided
to bless us with a brand new pile of cash (freshly minted no doubt) to
increase
conservation and tourism on our public lands.
Thank
God! Were it not for the good
graces of the DOI, the people in my part of the country would be
consigned to
real jobs with benefits! But lo! Here he comes descending on a cloud,
Ken
Salazar offering Americans in the West a chance to wait tables, tune
skis,
shine shoes and clean hotel rooms!
And
not a moment too soon! Were the
Secretary and the special interest groups not in control of the fate of
the
land in America’s West, those of us who live here might take the silly
notion
into our heads that we could buy homes, start businesses, send our
children to
college and perhaps even retire some day. What a relief indeed that
Secretary
Salazar and his acolytes have arrived on scene to remind us that our
true
purpose in life is to cater to those happy few with enough capitol on
hand to
actually recreate on our public lands.
Were
it not for Mr. Salazar, we of the
proletariat might still be laboring under the misguided notion that we
could
achieve something in our lives. And furthermore, the American people
would
still be struggling with the notion that energy to power our homes and
vehicles
with such things as coal, oil and natural gas rather than solar plants
(that
even segments of the environmentalist community object to) and
windmills that
make casserole out of eagles and bats, are viable options. Despite the
fact
that “renewable”
resources have yet to
become commercially viable, and have made a hash out of Spain’s economy.
I
don’t want to belittle the benefits
of tourism, hunting and fishing, nor do I want to belittle
conservation. Travel
and tourism are components of a healthy local economy and I have yet to
meet
anyone who seriously advocates doing away with wilderness, or who wants wholesale
clear cutting of
forests or wanton rape of the land. In my experience, those people
exist only
in the imaginations and propaganda of
the environmental left.
Those
of us who actually live adjacent
to those forest and deserts love them and enjoy them more than any
non-resident
could ever know. And we take care of them. I myself have two very bad
knees as
a result of time as a wildland firefighter, and
even the natural gas companies have invested
time and money in improving
sage grouse habitat.
So
while tourism, hunting fishing and
hiking are important, What Mr. Salazar, the rest of the Administration
and the
Environmental Left have so cavalierly ignored is that energy extraction
will provide
not only energy independence, but long term economic development. I
submit for
your perusal a study conducted by the Western Energy Alliance that
shows
benefits of accessing energy in the West:
http://westernenergyalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Blueprint-for-Western-Energy-Prosperity.pdf
For
those of you interested in the
Reader’s Digest version, the report says by 2020 the resources in the
West
could produce as much oil and natural gas on a daily basis as the U.S.
imports
from Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, Venezuela, Colombia, Algeria, Nigeria,
and
Russia combined, coupled with a 16 percent increase of direct and
indirect jobs
which includes 57 hundred jobs in the State of Utah alone. It also
highlights
the clean burning nature and affordability of natural gas and touches
on the
fact that where alleged experts once said that we had a 50 year supply
of
natural gas, that number is closer to 100 years.
This
translates not only into this
country being able to turn its back on foreign imports, but also buys
the time
needed to make renewable energy viable. And it creates jobs. Not just
jobs on a
rig or laying pipeline, but it generates jobs and
revenue for restaurants, hotels, clothing
stores, auto dealerships, hair salons, grocery stores, cell phone
stores…you
get the drift. When people are working, they purchase goods and
services,
and that creates
jobs, and moves money.
I
majored in religion in college and
even I get that. And domestic energy lowers the price of gasoline, and
natural
gas. Which means if we take natural gas out of the ground in Utah, it
will
lower the price for those who use it in Chicago.
But
these opportunities will be
derailed by the policies of the Department of The Interior which has
time and
again sought, and to add layers of extra review and administration to
the
leasing process, if not create outright roadblocks through such things
as the
BLM’s Master Leasing Program, Secretarial Order 3310, and additional
layers of
regulation handed down by the DOI two years ago. Add to that the
problem of de
facto wilderness. This problem cropped up recently
when the environmentalists, apparently
calling the shots had the Utah State Office the BLM close roads over
which it
has no authority, in southern Uintah County, Utah.
It
was not long after the Western
Energy Alliance study was released that the environmentalists came out
with a
report of their own
claiming that there
were no federal roadblocks to leasing. Read here.
In
that report, they raise what at
first blush seems to be a reasonable objection: If the oil and gas
companies
are not using the leases that they have, why grant them more access of
expedite
the process? Makes
sense right?
The
problem with that argument is that
the leasing process does not work the way the environmentalists would
have you
believe.
Simply
obtaining a lease does not give
a company an automatic right to drill. A lease serves only to identify
a piece
of land as having potential energy resources. In reality a lease only
serves to
inform all parties that an interest in the land exists. That piece of
land may
or may not be put up for bid, and the bidding is open to any interested
company, not just the company that identified it. And once the bid has
been
accepted, the company must then submit an Application for Permission to
Drill,
or APD. That kicks off is an exhaustive process in which Environmental
Assessments or Environmental Impact Statements are developed according
to the
NEPA process. During that time every aspect of the land in question and
the
effects of drilling on that land are scrutinized, and there is always
the
chance that the BLM will in fact say no. And of course during the
process, and
even after approval of the APD, any number of environmental groups can
sue, and
in fact have sued on behalf of prairies dogs, desert tortoises,
watershed
issues, plant species, air quality, water quality, you name, they will
sue over
it. And by the way, you pick up the tab for the legal counsel on those
suits
through your taxes. Look at your check stub and think about that when
you are
filling up your gas tank, or paying your heating bill this winter.
Some
companies take a more methodical
approach to drilling and will in fact go slow in order to maximize
their time
and efforts, and so they don’t always get to all of the parcels right
away.
Sometimes,
the resources may be in a
place that might be tougher to access, and a company may choose to wait
until
new, more environmentally friendly technology comes along before they
try to
access those resources.
Speaking
of technology, those
companies have worked to create such innovations as directional
drilling which
creates less surface disturbance, have begun recycling water used on
site, and
have switched to natural gas to power their equipment to reduce their
carbon
footprint. And did I mention federal law requires them to return the
land to
the condition in which they found it?
All of this in addition to the sage grouse
habitat I mentioned above.
If
in fact, the federal government
provides no impediment to drilling, why does drilling occur in a timely
fashion
on Utah’s School and Institutional Trust Lands which are managed by the
State,
and on private property in the Dakotas and in Pennsylvania? The
variable here
is the Administration, and administration that favors the environmental
left,
and supports energy resources that are not yet viable on a large scale.
And
so, I leave it to you to posit to
the President, the Department of the Interior, your members of Congress
and the
Senate why the resources in the West remain fallow, and the jobs will
remain
unclaimed. And why you will pay more for your energy in the years to
come.
Read
it with links at Townhall Finance
|