Townhall...
Federal
Court affirms “human physical
life” begins at conception
By Steven Aden
6/30/2011
On
Friday, June 24, a federal court
temporarily suspended portions of Indiana’s House Bill 1210, which
contained a
provision aimed at defunding abortionist organizations, like Planned
Parenthood, within the state. And although this suspension was
disappointing,
other aspects of the court’s decision were a boon for pro-life groups
in
Indiana and the whole nation. The reason is because the court upheld a
key
portion of the bill that requires women seeking abortions to be
informed that
“human physical life begins when a human ovum is fertilized by a human
sperm.”
In
other words, human physical life
begins at conception.
And
the news gets even better: the
court’s ruling came after Lee M. Silver, expert witness for Planned
Parenthood,
argued that “‘human physical life’ is meaningless” because “it is not a
scientific term.”
Silver,
a Princeton University
professor and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement
of
Science, told the court he had considered the opinions of Catholic
theologians
and bishops who believed life begins at conception but rejected them
because
they were belief-based. He said the position was “an understandable
religious
position” but not a scientific one. (Silver was not pressed to explain
why he
believed it was belief-based.) Silver told us much about the hole which
many
scientists have dug and fallen into regarding abortion, the beginning
of life,
and the nature of being human, when he said, “The scientific community
does not
accept the ‘fact’ that a fertilized egg, let alone a fetus, is human
physical
life.”
So
Silver willingly jumps from the
claim that scientific consensus does not recognize human physical life
as
beginning at conception, and he bolsters the point by claiming the
scientific
community also rejects life as present in “a fetus.” (For those of you
who are
not accustomed to talking in the covert jargon the left uses to cover
its
tracks, “a fetus” is a baby: it’s what you were before your mother went
into
labor.)
Therefore,
Silver’s expert testimony
boiled down to this: “human physical life” does not begin at conception
nor is
it present in a baby.
Wow,
science has come a long way
hasn’t it?
Fortunately,
the court did not concur with
Silver’s arguments, ruling instead that Indiana could insist that an
expectant mother
understand that they already nurture a human being in the womb, so
that, in the
words of the U.S. Supreme Court, she will “apprehend the full
consequences of
her decision” so that she may not “come to regret [her] choice to abort
the
infant life [she] once created and sustained.” This is great news for
everyone
who enjoys “human physical life,” but especially for those who remain
unseen
and vulnerable in their earliest stages of life.
|