Redstate...
Silence of
the Lambs
Posted by Erick Erickson
Tuesday, June 21
Yesterday,
I called on conservatives
and conservative organizations to actually dare to retaliate against
Republican
members of Congress who refuse to cut, cap, and balance before raising
the debt
ceiling.
If
any Republican dares to raise the
debt ceiling without first ensuring (1) cuts in the budget; (2) caps in
spending; and (3) the Lee-Cornyn-Hatch Balanced Budget Amendment makes
it out
to the states, conservatives must agree to at least attempt to find
someone to
primary them in their next election. More importantly, there must be
zero
tolerance for forgiveness on this issue.
Every
year, conservative groups come
up with pledges, the politicians nuance away the pledges, and the most
we get
is a tisk tisking that the pledge was violated.
If
our debt is the biggest national
security issue we now face, there must be more than that. There must be
scorched earth against any who vote to raise the debt ceiling without
cutting,
capping, and balancing first.
Here
are the sponsors of the pledge:
60
Plus, Act for America, American
Civil Rights Union, American Society for the Defense of Tradition,
Family and
Property, Americans for Limited Government, Christian Coalition,
Citizens
Against Government Waste, Citizens for the Republic, Citizens United,
Club for
Growth, Concerned Women for America, Conservative HQ, Council for
National
Policy, Family Pac Federal, Family Research Council Action,
FreedomWorks, Halt
the Debt, Independent Women’s Voice, Institute for Liberty, Less
Government,
Let Freedom Ring, Liberty Center for Law and Policy, Liberty Central,
Liberty
Counsel, National Tax Limitation Committee, National Taxpayers Union,
Patrick
Henry Center, Patriotic Veterans Inc, Renewing American Leadership
Action,
Taxpayers Protection Alliance, Tea Party Express, Tea Party WDC, and
The
Carleson Center for Public Policy.
Likewise,
Jim DeMint is a signatory to
the pledge.
Will
DeMint pledge to use the Senate
Conservatives fund to primary Republican Senators to balk at cutting,
capping,
and balancing? He is starting to sound like it. But sound is not action.
Will
the above listed groups do more
than tut-tut? I’ve heard from both For America and FRC Action PAC that
they are
serious and mean business. What about the others?
I
don’t want to put these groups in a
bad spot or make it sound like I’m hostile to them. I’m not. I support
the
pledge. But I am tired of conservative groups doing pledges that
ultimately
have no teeth in them.
This
is either the gravest threat we
face or it is not. And all these people and groups say it is. If they
are
serious, they must be prepared to wage war on the Republicans who
waver,
compromise, and nuance — whether those Republicans signed the pledge or
not.
“But
wait,” you say. “Some of these
cannot ‘wage war.’ There are tax exempt statuses to worry about. And
some of
those who betray us are in safe seats. We can’t waste our manpower
going after
them.”
Fine,
fine. If you are prevented from
going out and campaigning against these guys, then you certainly can
refrain
from inviting them to speak at or on behalf of your organization. You
can start
leaving them out of your literature. You can pretend they do not exist
unless
you can be critical of them.
Otherwise,
work to find a primary
opponent. Some of them won’t be beatable. Many of them, if we gang up
on them,
will go down in flames. The issue is whether you are going to tut-tut
or
actively work to ruin those who ruin this country.
I
know many of those who have signed
the Cut, Cap, and Balance Pledge. I hope you will too. I intend to. I
know most
of them and the organizations involved believe the day of judgment has
arrived
on our future as a country. So, just like on the real day of judgment,
the time
for forgiveness is over — politicians must now either be saved or
ruined. No
more second chances and future acts of redemption. It is a wonderful
thing that
the conservative movement is so full of Christian charity and
forgiveness, but
if this issue is judgment day then it’s also the day for
accountability, not
forgiveness, for politicians who claim to be part of the conservative
movement.
If
the conservative movement does not
treat capitulation on this issue as an ultimate, unforgivable act of
betrayal,
the conservative movement will never again be treated seriously by the
very
politicians the movement seeks to influence.
If
you just want to make a pledge and
then sit back, count me out. I’m done with heady rhetoric tied to
pledges that
amount to bark with no bite. So conservative movement, what do you
choose?
Read
it at Redstate
|