Investors.com...
Loudmouth
1% Are Trashing Rights Of
99%
By Thomas Sowell
Posted 10/31/2011
In
various cities across the country,
mobs of mostly young, mostly incoherent, often noisy and sometimes
violent
demonstrators are making themselves a major nuisance.
Meanwhile,
many in the media are
practically gushing over these “protesters,” and giving them the free
publicity
they crave for themselves and their cause — whatever that is, beyond
venting
their emotions on television.
Members
of the mobs apparently believe
that other people, who are working while they are out trashing the
streets,
should be forced to subsidize their college education — and apparently
the
president of the United States thinks so too.
But
if these loudmouths’ inability to
put together a coherent line of thought is any indication of their
education,
the taxpayers should demand their money back for having that money
wasted on
them for years in the public schools.
Sloppy
words and sloppy thinking often
go together, both in the mobs and in the media that are covering them.
It
is common, for example, to hear in
the media how some “protesters” were arrested. But anyone who reads
this column
regularly knows that I protest against all sorts of things — and don’t
get
arrested.
The
difference is that I don’t block
traffic, join mobs sleeping overnight in parks or urinate in the
street. If the
media cannot distinguish between protesting and disturbing the peace,
then
their education may also have wasted a lot of taxpayers’ money.
Among
the favorite sloppy words used
by the shrill mobs in the streets is “Wall Street greed.” But even if
you think
people in Wall Street, or anywhere else, are making more money than
they
deserve, “greed” is no explanation whatever.
“Greed”
says how much you want. But
you can become the greediest person on earth and that will not increase
your
pay in the slightest. It is what other people pay you that increases
your
income.
If
the government has been sending too
much of the taxpayers’ money to people in Wall Street — or anywhere
else — then
the irresponsibility or corruption of politicians is the problem.
“Occupy Wall
Street” hooligans should be occupying Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington.
Maybe
some of the bankers or
financiers should have turned down the millions and billions that
politicians
were offering them. But sainthood is no more common in Wall Street than
on
Pennsylvania Avenue — or in the media or academia, for that matter.
Actually,
some banks did try to refuse
the government bailout money, to avoid the interference with their
business
that they knew would come with it. But the feds insisted — and federal
regulators’ power to create big financial problems for banks made it
hard to
say no. The feds made them an offer they couldn’t refuse.
People
who cannot distinguish between
democracy and mob rule may fall for the idea that the hooligans in the
street
represent the 99% who are protesting about the “greed” of the 1%.
But
these hooligans are less than 1%,
and they are grossly violating the rights of vastly larger numbers of
people
who have to put up with their trashing of the streets by day and their
noise
that keeps working people awake at night.
As
for the “top 1%” in income that
attract so much attention, angst and denunciation, there is always
going to be
a top 1%, unless everybody has the same income. That top 1% has no more
monopoly on sainthood or villainy than people in any other bracket.
Moreover,
that top 1% does not consist
of the “millionaires and billionaires” that Barack Obama talks about.
You don’t
even have to make half a million dollars to be in the top 1%.
Moreover,
this is not an enduring
class of people. Nor are people in other income brackets. Most of the
people in
the top 1% at any given time are there for only one year. Anyone who
sells an
average home in San Francisco can get into the top 1% in income — for
that
year. Other one-time spikes in income account for most of the people in
that
top 1%.
But
such plain facts carry little
weight amid the heady rhetoric and mindless emotions of the mob and the
media.
Read
this and other articles at
investors.com
|