Mail
Magazine 24
Obama
demands $1.6 trillion tax boost, and an
unlimited credit card
Neil Munro writes at the Daily Caller
(dailycaller.com):
President
Barack Obama has dramatically upped
his demands in the fiscal crisis negotiations: He wants Congress to
levy twice
as much in extra taxes from Americans as he urged during the election
campaign,
give up its control over the nation’s debt limit, and fund an immediate
$50
billion stimulus for his political priorities.
In
exchange, Obama offered to consider — but
not necessarily accept — GOP proposals for cutting $400 billion from
Medicare
and other programs strongly favored by off-year voters.
That
listening session would take place
sometime in 2013, giving the president plenty of time to wrap the
unpopular
demand around the necks of the GOP legislators before the 2014 midterm
elections.
The
surprise package was given to Republican
House Speaker John Boehner on Thursday by Treasury Secretary Timothy
Geithner.
Geithner
presided over Obama’s four-year
spending spree, which has left 23 million Americans unemployed,
underemployed
or out of the workforce. That spending has been funded by $7 trillion
in
borrowed funds or government-printed cash, generating additional debt
of
roughly $20,000 per person.
The
budget package is slated to avoid the
economic pain due from the scheduled Jan. 1 imposition of planned
budget cuts
and tax increases, worth $500 billion during 2013.
Boehner
and other Republicans derided Obama’s
wishlist, which was described by the New York Times as
”a detailed proposal … loaded with
Democratic
priorities and short in detailed spending cuts.”
The
Washington Post described the package as
lacking “any concessions to Republicans, most notably on the core issue
of
where to set tax rates for the wealthiest Americans… [and] it seemed to
take
Republicans by surprise.”
“I’m
here seriously trying to resolve [the
fiscal crisis], and I would hope the White House would get serious as
well,”
Boehner told reporters Thursday.
The
package is “a step backward,” said the
Republican’s minority leader in the Senate, Mitch McConnell.
Some
GOP legislators also complained about
Obama’s use of a closed-door negotiation process.
“Until
this fantasy ‘plan’ from a secret
meeting is made public and scored by the Congressional Budget Office,
it does
not exist,” said an evening statement from Sen. Jeff Sessions, the
Republican’s
ranking chairman on the Senate budget committee.
“Based
on history, we can safely assume that
reports that this ‘plan’ saves $4 trillion is a fabrication [and] is a
distraction that allows the White House to continue to run out the
clock so it
can have maximal leverage to force through a bad deal in the last
minutes
before midnight.”
If
accepted, Obama’s new demand that Congress
give up its control over the debt limit would mark a huge loss of
Congress’
financial power to the executive branch.
The
debt-limit caps the federal government’s
debt, which is now set at $16.4 trillion.
Annual
tax receipts are only enough to fund the
government spending for the first nine months of each year, and Obama
can’t
legally borrow money on the international market once that debt limit
is
reached in early 2013.
In
2011, Republicans used their power over the
debt limit to squeeze some spending reductions from Obama.
On
Thursday, Boehner said Obama would have to
bargain for another increase in the debt limit by curbing spending.
But
Obama’s post-election lunge for more taxes
and an even bigger federal government has also cracked the public unity
of GOP
legislators.
Sessions
and other GOP legislators worry that
Obama’s team is posturing in front of the media and voters, while
actually
delaying and blocking budget talks with Boehner, until the deadline is
almost
up on Jan. 1.
By
posturing until Jan. 1, Obama can pressure
Boehner and other Republicans leaders to rush an last-minute
tax-increase
through Congress while sidelining other legislators and voters, say GOP
legislators, including Sessions.
It
is “only the speaker and the president of
the United States who are negotiating,” Sessions complained.
“Apparently the
[Democratic] majority leader of the Senate is not intimately involved,
the
[Democratic] chairman of the budget committee is not involved, the
[Democratic]
chairman of the finance committee is not involved. … Certainly
Republican
leaders are not involved,” he said.
“Shouldn’t
the president of the United States,
the only person who represents everybody in the country, lay out his
plan, or
must that remain a secret too? Will it just be revealed to us on the
eve of
Christmas or eve of the new calendar year? We will be asked to vote for
it, to
ratify it like lemmings, I suppose,” he said in a Thursday statement in
the
Senate.
“We
[senators] ought to be engaged, [because
that] would allow the American people to know what’s happening,” he
concluded.
Read
this and other articles at Mail Magazine
24
|