Cleveland
Plain Dealer...
Natural
gas: cheap, clean and risky: Hal Harvey
January 15, 2012
Political
leaders from both parties argue that natural gas could save our
economy, the
environment and promote our national security. Is this so? Or is it
just a
dream?
It turns
out that the way one develops natural gas will determine whether it is
a
serious help to our energy and climate problems, or a dangerous
extension of
bad habits.
On the face
of it, natural gas looks terrific. The United States -- and many other
countries -- have abundant domestic supplies. The cost, per delivered
unit of
energy, is about a third of that of oil. It is cheap and fast to build
power
plants fueled by natural gas. And when burned, it emits only half as
much
carbon as coal. So what’s not to like?
Well,
things are not so simple. Under the best conditions, we may enjoy those
benefits, but under more adverse conditions, gas can be a worse
generator of
greenhouse gas than coal, can wreak massive local environmental
destruction and
can undermine energy efficiency and renewable energy. And without a
strong set
of policies to guide natural gas development, the worst case is far
more
likely.
Start with
climate change: Generating a kilowatt-hour’s worth of electricity with
a
natural gas turbine emits only about half as much CO2 as generating the
same
electricity at a coal plant. Half-off is pretty good. But unburned
natural gas
turns out to be a very powerful greenhouse gas: One molecule of leaked
gas
contributes as much to global warming as 25 molecules of burned gas.
That means
that if the system for the exploration, extraction, compression, piping
and
burning of natural gas leaks by even 2.5 percent, it is as bad as coal.
So, how
much does the gas system leak? No one knows: Estimates range from 1.5
percent
to as high as 8 percent. Even near the low end of that range, gas can
be as bad
as coal. And whatever the leaks in the U.S. system, it is likely to be
far
worse in, say, Russia.
This gives
us Rule One for smart natural gas development: No leaks in the system.
We have
to know, for certain, that the whole process is tight, and stays that
way.
There’s
more we need to ensure, because of the economics of energy systems, and
how
that drives the choice of options in the electricity system. It starts
with a
basic economic truth: Once a coal-fired plant is built, it is
incredibly cheap
to run. Once built, our coal plants run forever. The median age of a
coal plant
in the United States is 44 years, and fully a third of them were built
during
or before the Eisenhower administration.
What this
means is that when we add new natural gas power plants to the
electricity
system, it does not, through pure market forces, displace coal.
Instead, it
displaces other new alternatives, which generally means new renewable
energy.
If half-CO2 gas is displacing zero-CO2 renewables, well, that’s hardly
a
victory. So, Rule Two: Use gas to shut down old coal. Make this an
explicit
condition.
The final
three rules have to do with local environmental conditions. We have all
seen
the films of people’s tap water catching fire after a nearby gas well
was put
in. That’s because of lousy construction quality: Bad well casings
allow gas to
leak into the aquifer. They can also allow in fluids from hydraulic
fracturing (fracking)
when that method is used to tap a new gas well. Rule Three: Strong
standards
for wells, with effective monitoring and enforcement.
Then there
is the damage that wells can do to the gas site. Many wells extract
brackish
water and other nasty byproducts, like benzene and toluene, from deep
underground, and spill the mixture onto nearby farmlands -- literally
salting
the earth. The water is a large-scale byproduct of the gas extraction,
and, at
the request of then-Vice President Dick Cheney’s energy task force, it
is
exempted from any regulations under the Clean Water Act. Rule Four:
Don’t allow
these toxic streams to poison the land.
Finally,
choosing where and how to drill is important. Many of the new natural
gas
technologies entail massive surface disturbance. Roads, drilling rigs,
compressors, pipelines, drainage ponds and large amounts of heavy
equipment are
required for each well. And wells are densely placed, sometimes one for
every
10 acres. This means that many natural gas fields are industrial
wastelands.
After drilling, cattle ranches in the West have been left unsuitable
even for
cows, never mind wildlife.
We need to
zone natural gas development so that it is kept out of ecologically
important
areas, and we need strong drilling, operating and reclamation standards
so that
gas doesn’t become a scorched-earth energy strategy.
Gas can do
a great deal for our energy future. But if it is mishandled, it can
instead
serve up great problems -- in land destruction, water quality and
climate change.
Five rules get it right: Don’t allow leaky systems; use gas to phase
out coal;
have sound well drilling and casing standards; don’t pollute the
landscape with
brackish water; and drill only where it is sensible. Let’s do this
right.
Read this
and other articles at the Cleveland Plain Dealer
|