Mail
Magazine 24...
Just
when
you thought things couldn’t get worse…
by Michael
Becker
March 25, 2012
There’s a
financial tsunami nobody’s talking about.
OK, so
maybe I’ve overstated the point. It’s certainly being talked about in
the far
corners of the nation, in some cities and towns, and an occasional
state house,
but it’s not being addressed on the national level and the parties
responsible
– primarily at the state and local level – are hoping against hope that
the
federal government will step in. After all, California and Illinois, to
name
just two, are simply too big to fail.
We’re
talking about state, county and municipal pension funds. If the people
who run
your city aren’t talking about your city’s pension fund, go to a city
council
meeting, go to your representative’s office and the mayor’s office and
find out
why.
Here’s the
crux of the problem. These pension funds are set up as “defined
benefit”
retirement funds. In other words, the retirement package is predefined
when an
employee is hired and the contributions by both the employee – in the
rare case
the employee actually contributes anything – and the hiring entity
(state,
county or municipal government) are supposed to be adjusted to keep the
plan
“funded”. Unlike your 401K or IRA, which is a defined contribution
plan, it
lays out the level of contribution by the employer and employee and the
benefit
is undefined.
The primary
cause of our current problems with the defined benefit plans is the
one-two
punch of public employee unions and politicians managing the plans.
This
combination is a death spiral, not just for the pension plans but for
the
nation at large. It’s a really simple exercise of political power.
Public
employees are a large voting bloc, politicians promise their union ever
increasing benefits, the unions deliver votes on behalf of those
politicians.
If you’d like to know specifically who is complicit in this
racketeering and vote
buying, take note that the largest single contributor to political
races in
2010 was the American Federation of State and Municipal Employees
(AFSME) and
virtually every nickel of their $87.5 million went to Democrats.
Private
sector unions are in the boat with their public sector brethren, they
contributed over $400 million primarily to Democrats in 2008, another
$200
million in 2010 and in the upcoming cycle, they can likely be counted
on for
well over $500 million in cash and likely 400,000 union bodies to knock
on
doors and work in Democratic campaigns.
It’s worth
noting that union controlled pension funds are over $160 billion
underfunded.
Guess who they’re going to come to in order to make up the difference.
With
reference to the states, counties and municipalities, just how big is
the hole?
Well, it makes the 2008 banking disaster look like the good old days.
Really.
Senator
Orrin Hatch held hearings last year – and you can guess why you haven’t
heard
about them – and found that the pension problem across the country was
in the
realm of $4 trillion dollars. Four trillion dollars.
In
California, the state pension funds are underfunded by about $350-$400
billion.
The folk managing the funds dispute this, and the heart of the dispute
is the
assumed return on investment of the fund. CalPERS has been assuming an
8%
return and a Stanford University study notes the projected returns
should be
more like 4%. CalPERS historical return is 8.1%, but last year they
earned
1.1%. The CalPERS committee did finally take action, they voted to
reduce the
expected rate of return from 8% to 7.75%. Still Neverland, but at least
they
moved in the right direction.
The CalPERS
move has consequences for the municipalities in the state. This means
that
cities will see their required pension payments rise — between 1
percent and 2
percent for general workers, and between 2 percent and 3 percent for
more
expensive public safety workers, beginning next year, according to a
CalPERS
“warning” that went out last month.
Throw in
price inflation and wage inflation, and you’re looking at cities and
the state
paying pension bills that are 4 percent to 5 percent higher for general
workers, and 7 percent to 8 percent higher for public safety workers,
CalPERS
said…
“Many
public agencies are concerned that this change in the discount rate
will cause
considerable financial hardship to already financially strapped local
budgets,”
the League of California Cities said of the change.
But it’s
not just cities. State and schools employer contributions will increase
by 1.2
to 1.6 percent for general workers and 2.2 to 2.4 percent for safety
workers,
CalPERS said in a statement Wednesday.
That’s
expected to cost the state $303 million.
Schools
will see an increase of $137 million.
And you may
have heard that the state budget is not in the most robust health.
I could
cite state after state: Illinois, Pennsylvania and a good summary of 25
states
from, of all people, NPR.
The pension
problems at the state and below level are much more serious and more
problematic than federal deficits because the feds can print money and
are not
required to balance their budget. States and localities do not have
that
option, and they also have very limited options for increasing taxes.
In
California, for example, Governor Brown is pushing a ballot initiative
that
will “temporarily” increase state taxes. He’s threatening Armageddon if
it
doesn’t pass. In jurisdictions that raise most of their operating
budget from
things like property taxes, they are in a huge bind, not only are
property
owners over-taxed, property values are still dropping and banks are
increasing
their foreclosure activity which will lead to a real cash flow crunch
because
banks don’t typically pay the property taxes.
The
chickens of unlimited, unending prosperity and vote buying are coming
home to
roost. We’ve already seen a couple of municipalities declare bankruptcy
and it
will be a wave. Talk to the folks who manage your city. Do everything
you can
to push them to find a responsible solution to your city’s pension
issues now
because it won’t get any better.
Source:
libertynews
Read this
and other articles at Mail Magazine 24
|