Townhall...
What
the
Washington Post Missed
by Ken
Blackwell
May 15,
2012
Last week,
the Washington Post produced a front-page story intended to shock
readers with
the news of Mitt Romney’s leading fellow preppies in cutting the
bleach-blond
hair of a student at their school. The incident in question took place
in 1965,
some 47 years ago. The news that Mitt Romney did dumb things in high
school was
played as if it was most revealing. But, unconnected to anything else,
it leaves
the reader puzzled? Why this story? Why now?
Liberal
commentators are quick to respond: It’s all part of the narrative
(their
favorite word, by the way). And the narrative is of an unfeeling,
bullying,
brash young man.
Okay. Let’s
say it’s relevant. Here are some of the stories the Post did not think
relevant.
Item: Bill
Clinton as a graduate student at Oxford University spent a week in the
home of
Bedrich and Jirina Kopold in Prague. Early in 1970, Clinton was the
guest of
two members of the Czech Communist Party Central Committee. These were
not even
“liberal” reform-minded Czech backers of ousted leader Anton Dubcek.
That
father of the “Prague Spring” of 1968 had tried to bring about
“Communism with
a human face.”
He failed.
After Soviet tanks rolled through Prague, Dubcek wound up in chains in
Moscow.
There, a drunken Brezhnev sneered and jeered at Dubcek and some of his
fellow
chained Communist brothers because they had soiled themselves. This
wasn’t the
Kopold team, however. Bedrich and Jirina were the hard-line Stalinists
who
demanded the Soviet tanks come in and crush these first shoots of
freedom
sprouting up in Wenceslas Square. These were Bill Clinton’s hosts, the
parents
of his fellow Oxonian, Jan Kopold. In 1970, if you were a Czech, you
had to toe
the line for Moscow in order to be allowed to go to graduate school
outside the
country. Jan Kopold and his parents passed the KGB’s litmus test.
Item: John
Kerry was a leader of the anti-war faction in the U.S. He testified in
1971
before Sen. J. William Fulbright’s Foreign Relations Committee, wearing
half of
his uniform, and all of his medals. Kerry charged his fellow soldiers
with war
crimes and said they violated the Geneva Conventions. This was after he
met
with North Vietnamese Communist in 1970 in Paris. The Post did cover
this
story, but only on page A8, and only in the context of reporting on a
Swift
Boat Veterans for Truth ad attacking Kerry.
Did anyone
ask Kerry if he had pressed the North Vietnamese to observe the Geneva
Convention for treatment of POWs? At the time Kerry was chatting with
them, we
now know, our POWs were undergoing torture routinely in Hanoi. Did
Kerry make
any demands of the Communist enemies of his country? If so, where are
his
contemporary notes? The Post apparently doesn’t consider this news you
need to
know. Since 1798, it has been against federal law (the Logan Act) for
private
citizens to negotiate with foreign powers. Did Kerry negotiate or not?
We may
never know.
Item: In
April 1983, Columbia student Barack Obama attended the Socialist
Scholars
Conference in New York City. His presence there is documented. He
admits as
much in Dreams from My Father. The scholars at the conference were all
Marxists
and the meeting was held to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Marx’s
death.
Obama notes that he consciously sought out “radicals” among the
professors and
students he studied with. “Radicals’ were not radical environmentalists
or
radical pro-lifers or radical right wingers. The radicals he consorted
with
were almost all Marxists, like Frank Marshall Davis, his mentor.
For most of
the time after World War II, such associations would have prevented
Clinton,
Kerry, and Obama from receiving a security clearance to see classified
documents. The fact is now that national security safeguards are being
compromised daily. These are not justWikiLeaks. The identification of
SEAL TEAM
6, the disclosure by President Obama of the number of U.S. atomic
weapons
(5,113), and the most recent leaks about how we infiltrated Al Qaeda on
the
Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) are examples of a serious breakdown in
safeguarding
national security.
Since
Marxists were responsible for 100 million deaths in the past century
and since
Communist China, North Korea, and Cuba continue to kill their
opponents, these
associations and activities by major contenders for the White House
ought to
have been considered newsworthy. To be sure, many leftists profess
Marx’s
doctrines without endorsing the violence and oppression that always
seem to
accompany Marxist states.
Shouldn’t
Americans have been advised to question these men on how they view
Marxism?
Yet none of
these background stories on Clinton, Kerry, or Obama was splashed
across the
front page of the Washington Post. Chances are the editors of the Post
will not
even be questioned about their judgment of what is newsworthy. So, when
you see
such stories in the hometown newspaper of our nation’s capital, you can
only
say: Consider the source.
Read this
article with links, plus others, at Townhall
|