Investors.com...
The
Shameless Lies Of Politics Are The Path To Election
By Thomas
Sowell
May 22, 2012
The fact
that so many successful politicians are such shameless liars is not
only a
reflection on them, it is also a reflection on us. When the people want
the
impossible, only liars can satisfy them, and only in the short run.
The current
outbreaks of riots in Europe show what happens when the truth catches
up with
both the politicians and the people in the long run.
Among the
biggest lies of the welfare states on both sides of the Atlantic is the
notion
that the government can supply the people with things they want but
cannot
afford. Since the government gets its resources from the people, if the
people
as a whole cannot afford something, neither can the government.
There is,
of course, the perennial fallacy that the government can simply raise
taxes on
“the rich” and use that additional revenue to pay for things that most
people
cannot afford. What is amazing is the implicit assumption that “the
rich” are
all such complete fools that they will do nothing to prevent their
money from
being taxed away. History shows otherwise.
After the
Constitution of the United States was amended to permit a federal
income tax,
in 1916, the number of people reporting taxable incomes of $300,000 a
year or
more fell from well over a thousand to fewer than three hundred by 1921.
Were the
rich all getting poorer? Not at all. They were investing huge sums of
money in
tax-exempt securities. The amount of money invested in tax-exempt
securities
was larger than the federal budget, and nearly half as large as the
national
debt.
This was
not unique to the United States or to that era. After the British
government
raised their income tax on the top income earners in 2010, they
discovered that
they collected less tax revenue than before. Other countries have had
similar
experiences. Apparently the rich are not all fools, after all.
In today’s
globalized world economy, the rich can simply invest their money in
countries
where tax rates are lower.
So, if you
cannot rely on “the rich” to pick up the slack, what can you rely on?
Lies.
Nothing is
easier for a politician than promising government benefits that cannot
be
delivered. Pensions such as Social Security are perfect for this role.
The
promises that are made are for money to be paid many years from now —
and
somebody else will be in power then, left with the job of figuring out
what to
say and do when the money runs out and the riots start.
There are
all sorts of ways of postponing the day of reckoning. The government
can refuse
to pay what it costs to get things done. Cutting what doctors are paid
for
treating Medicare patients is one obvious example.
That of
course leads some doctors to refuse to take on new Medicare patients.
But this
process takes time to really make its full impact felt — and elections
are held
in the short run. This is another growing problem that can be left for
someone
else to try to cope with in future years.
Increasing
amounts of paperwork for doctors in welfare states with government-run
medical
care, and reduced payments to those doctors in order to stave off the
day of
bankruptcy, mean that the medical profession is likely to attract fewer
of the
brightest young people who have other occupations available to them —
paying
more money and having fewer hassles. But this too is a long-run problem
— and
elections are still held in the short run.
Eventually,
all these long-run problems can catch up with the wonderful-sounding
lies that
are the lifeblood of welfare state politics. But there can be a lot of
elections between now and eventually — and those who are good at
political lies
can win a lot of those elections.
As the day
of reckoning approaches, there are a number of ways of seeming to
overcome the
crisis. If the government is running out of money, it can print more
money.
That does not make the country any richer, but it quietly transfers
part of the
value of existing money from people’s savings and income to the
government, whose
newly printed money is worth just as much as the money that people
worked for
and saved.
Printing
more money means inflation — and inflation is a quiet lie, by which a
government can keep its promises on paper, but with money worth much
less than
when the promises were made.
Is it so
surprising voters with unrealistic hopes elect politicians who lie
about being
able to fulfill those hopes?
Read this
and other articles at Investors.com
|