Townhall
Finance...
Time
Magazine vs Mothers on Mother’s Day
by Gina
Loudon
May 14, 2012
TIME
Magazine, in synchronized coordination with the rest of the pathetic
media,
found some random mother and child to exploit to mock a reverent
holiday. The
article is presumably about the conflicts
associated with “attachment parenting”—a parenting theory popular in
the 1970’s
that has made a small comeback among mothers today.
The cover
touts a mother posed with her 3-year-old boy (whom they made look much
older in
the photo) with his mouth fixed on her breast for all to see. Willing to neglect all
social graces to boost
their slow sales at TIME, the magazine pits parental rights advocates
against
breastfeeding mothers, and makes a mockery of motherhood, in general.
The cover
is mere bait to lure curious onlookers to subscribe to their site to
read the
article. I didn’t. But the content of the
article is somewhat
irrelevant, because it has become the “Mother’s Day” photo of 2012,
drawing
unknown numbers of confused onlookers to subscribe just to see what is
said
about this photo.
I submit
that their cover exposes a deeper agenda.
I see a disgusting political play to attempt
to force families to
cynically choose sides between the “out of my bedroom” business, and
the
“family-friendly, values-voters” types.
This sort of division is an attempt to prop up
the Obama re-election
campaign’s invention of a Republican “war on women” that doesn’t exist.
Comments
immediately ensued with feminists screaming at all proverbial white men
to keep
their hands off of their bodies (as she bares it complete with a photo
suggesting indecency, even sexual perversion).
I am the
mother of five amazing children. I
breast fed all of my children for years, and did so publicly when
appropriate. I wore
my babies in a
sling, and subscribe to many of the bonding techniques advocated in
Attachment
Parenting theory. I
spoke recently to a
group of women who advocate total freedom for birthing babies, and I
helped my
husband pass the Birth Freedom Act in the Missouri State Senate. I
believe such
freedoms are a parent’s constitutional right.
TIME Magazine’s attempt to draw lines between
breastfeeding advocates
and First Amendment advocates is flawed. Conservative women are savvy,
and will
not fall into the trap that liberals are setting for them. Conservative
women will not be told that
they need to choose between their private rights as parents to mother
their
children as they see fit, and common moral decency.
Benjamin
Franklin warned, “We have given you a republic, if you can keep it.” Those profound words mean
that Americans
would enjoy the greatest liberties of any people in the history of
mankind, but
we would only be allowed those liberties as long as we can self govern. Time and again, virtually
every one of the
founding fathers described the strong moral character, and the peoples’
ability
to self govern as the key to the survival of the republic. This photo is exhibit A of
the media’s attack
on our Country using a “victim flavor of the day”—in this case, mothers
and
their children.
Every
conservative I know supports a woman’s right to breastfeed, and most
understand
that sometimes, that means that women will nurse discretely in public. TIME Magazine’s portrayal
ignores all decency
and glamorizes a woman making a nuisance of herself.
There is no controversy here.
The question of “where to draw the line” is
an old one, but TIME brought it up now, as if to say that conservatives
must
consent to all portrayals of breastfeeding or they are “anti-woman.” What is the next
controversial cover that
conservatives will be forced to condone or be branded “anti-woman”? Maybe they will show a
single dad naked in
bed with his young son? Perhaps
they
will feature a baby being breast fed by a medically enhanced, breasted
man? The list goes
on.
The media’s
deliberate attempt to pit groups of people into corners and to divide
them
should offend every “victim flavor of the day” that they attempt to
exploit.
Contrast
the spin and exploitation of the current media’s efforts to carry the
water for
this administration, with the 1980’s administration of Ronald Reagan. He quoted a Jewish proverb
that sums it up
beautifully: “God
could not be
everywhere – so He created mothers.”
This
mother’s day, I hope that mothers everywhere are blessed, and that they
fundamentally reject the leftist media’s attempt to divide us based
upon our
private parenting practices. Further,
I
hope that those who have the insight to see through this thinly veiled
exploitation will dig deep inside and use every bit of maternal grit
they can
muster to fight for the Constitution that this administration and media
assaults daily.
That way,
one day our daughters and sons will have the same rights we have to
parent
their children as they best deem fit.
Our founders understood a principle my
co-author and I discuss at length
in our new book, coming out later this summer.
Charles Carroll, Signer of the Declaration of
Independence said that
“Without morals, a republic cannot subsist any length of time; they
therefore
who are decrying the Christian religion…are undermining the solid
foundation of
morals, the best security for the duration of free governments.”
God bless
our Mothers, this Mother’s Day!
Read this
and other articles at Townhall Finance
|