|
|
The
views expressed
on this page are soley those of the author and do not
necessarily
represent the views of County News Online
|
Mail
Magazine 24
Was it stolen
by Bright Knight
When you add the information about the results in Cleveland and in the
Philly locations, where Inspectors were removed, to the information in
this article, you might question the whole election. Dave writes at
tothepointnews.com:
[Note by Dr. Jack Wheeler: We are being asked to believe that Romney
got close to three million fewer votes in 2012 than John McCain got in
2008. That's not possible. This election is a fraud. I don't know
exactly how - rigging voting machines, hacking tabulation software, not
counting military absentee ballots, whatever. What I do know is that it
is totally beyond believability and into the realm of ridiculously
absurd that Romney actually got any fewer votes than McCain in 2008,
much less millions fewer. Thus the answer to Dave's question must be
Yes.]
I hate going down a birther road, but yes I believe the election was
stolen, and the implications of that are very bad.
First of all, Obama received 10 million less votes than he did in 2008.
The part that is unbelievable is that Romney received 3 million less
votes than McCain. At the end of the day, Obama won in the 4 critical
swing states by 500,000 votes.
But it is worse than that. We can look at who voted. By examining the
number of Independents and their preference shift among actual voters,
we know that 5 million Independents changed their votes from Obama to
Romney. So Romney started the day 2.5 million votes ahead of where
McCain was in 2008.
This means that 5.5 million Republican voters are not accounted for.
They didn't show up at the polls, or their votes were not counted. We
know now that no subgroup of the coalition decided to sit out. So the
current attempts to blame the Social Conservatives are stupid. All of
our groups showed up to vote at the rates they did in 2008. For this to
be true, over 10% of Republicans needed to decide not to vote this
year, who did vote in 2008.
Does that make any sense?
In fact, it is even worse, we know for a fact that heavy GOP counties
were swamped all day. We watched all day as, e.g., Pasco County Florida
was showing huge increases in GOP voters over the 2008 numbers.
In Virginia, with 69% of the precincts in, Romney held a 6% lead. Yet
once a small number of counties reported, that lead disappeared.
If the vote drop off occurred, it occurred in a very small number of
counties. It was not visible nationwide.
I contend that you can not get a 10% drop off in GOP turnout without it
being noticeable during the GOTV effort, measures of enthusiasm in
polling, or visibly lower turnout in GOP leaning precincts.
For anyone who doesn't want to think that the Obama campaign would
engage in such blatant election fraud, contemplate this. These are the
same people who ran Fast and Furious without regard for the cost in
human lives, turned off their credit card verification system to allow
fraudulent donations, and allowed four Americans in Libya to die
because it was politically inconvenient. Do you really think that
massive election fraud is something they wouldn't do?
If this is true, then we have some hard things to consider.
First of all, we are now needlessly fracturing our coalition pointing
fingers at people for not voting. Second, we are making an assumption
about the make up of the American public that is not true. We are going
to modify our party and message to appeal to a group of individuals who
do not represent the majority of the population.
Most difficult to believe is that we are living in Venezuela where our
elections are merely for show, and the people in charge of the
Governments decide who will win elections. We become wards of the
State, which is the aim of those who stole this election.
So how can this be proved?
I am going to start by looking at a few key counties in Florida. What I
want to see is the voter registration numbers by party, and then
compare them to the actual votes received. Theoretically, if this were
to be done for all counties in Florida, we could see where the fraud
occurred.
Comparing the votes Romney received to the strike lists would show that
in specific counties Romney received something like 50% of the
Republican vote (picking a number out of the air) while we know that
nationwide he received 95% of the Republican vote.
To really get to the answer, we would need to get the registration
books, which might be possible through Freedom of Information act.
Those show who actually voted, by name, and their party.
The media will not pursue this. This will take citizen journalists
working in every state.
And here another nice election result: in good old Socialist/Communist
tradition (as I mentioned at the beginning of this post), Obama got
even more than 100% of the votes in one County. Folks, if THAT is not
fraud, what is fraud? Daniel Greenfield reports at Breitbart:
Mr. Obama won Wood County in Ohio this year. That’s right, Mr. Obama
won the majority of Wood County’s 108% of registered voters. That’s not
a typo.
In 2012, 106,258 people in Wood County are registered to vote out of an
eligible 98,213.
Secretary of College Democrats Morgan Holliger chimed in, “We won Wood
County, we won Ohio.”
Mr. Obama did indeed win Wood County, along with its 108% of voters.
Read this (with links) and other articles at Mail Magazine 24
|
|
|
|
