|
|
The
views expressed
on this page are soley those of the author and do not
necessarily
represent the views of County News Online
|
NPR
A Week Later,
Pollster Says: 'I Was Drinking That Republican Kool-Aid'
by S.V. DÁTE
November 14, 2012
If voters were surprised to watch TV networks call the election for
President Obama over Republican Mitt Romney minutes after polls closed
in California last week, perhaps it was because of earlier statements
like these:
—"Romney has pretty much nailed down Florida."
—"I think in places like North Carolina, Virginia and Florida, we've
already painted those red, we're not polling any of those states again."
—"Minnesota is very much a battleground state due to the low minority
population of the state and President Obama's problems with white
voters. Romney has a good chance to pull off one of the biggest upsets
of the election cycle in this state."
Those predictions came from Brad Coker of Mason-Dixon Polling and
Research in remarks to his Florida newspaper clients; David Paleologos,
a pollster from Suffolk University, speaking to Fox News; and Glen
Bolger, a pollster at Public Opinion Strategies, writing a memo for the
Republican-affiliated firm NMB Research.
Coker's poll showed Romney ahead in Florida by 6 percentage points on
Nov. 2, four days before the election. Florida went for Obama by a
single percentage point.
Paleologos made his comments during an Oct. 9 appearance on Bill
O'Reilly's TV show. Obama went on to win Virginia as well as Florida,
and only lost North Carolina by 2 percentage points.
And Bolger's memo was released to the media by the conservative
American Future Fund on Nov. 4, just two days before Obama won
Minnesota by 8 percentage points.
Many Republicans over the final weekend, particularly those appearing
on conservative media, were predicting not just a Romney victory but a
substantial Romney victory, with upwards of 300 electoral votes. Much
of that optimism seemed based on these and similar polls in both the
presidential and Senate contests.
Mason-Dixon, for example, released late polls showing Senate GOP leads
in both Montana and North Dakota. It showed Missouri Republican Todd
Akin — notorious for his comment that female bodies had the ability to
prevent pregnancy in cases of "legitimate" rape — trailing incumbent
Claire McCaskill by just 2 percentage points. Democrats won in all
three Senate races; McCaskill won by 15 percentage points.
"To say that I'm unhappy would be an understatement," said Harry
Wilson, head of the polling center at Virginia's Roanoke College, which
projected 5-point Virginia wins for both Romney and GOP Senate
candidate George Allen on Oct. 31. Romney lost the state by 3
percentage points, and Allen lost by 5. "I was drinking that Republican
Kool-Aid," Wilson said.
Wilson and other pollsters cited the same miscalculation: an assumption
that the electorate that showed up Nov. 6 would be older, whiter and
more Republican than the one that actually turned out. Obama's victory
in 2008, juiced by higher-than-normal turnout by young voters and
minorities, was seen as an aberration, unlikely to be repeated in a
struggling economy.
"It was a defensible, logical decision — that was wrong," Wilson said.
Paleologos said his decision to stop polling Florida, Virginia and
North Carolina was based on limited resources and a desire to poll
Colorado and Ohio, but also on "the incumbency rule," a long-accepted
premise that if an incumbent cannot rise above 47 percent or so in
head-to-head polling, he is unlikely to win.
"What I've learned is that there's a new norm," he said. "The
incumbency rule does not hold, at least in Florida and Virginia."
Scott Rasmussen is a Republican favorite, a prolific pollster who
appeared frequently on Fox News with upbeat assessments of Romney's
chances. His late polls showed Romney ahead in Virginia, Colorado and
Iowa, and tied in Wisconsin and Ohio. Obama won all five states.
On his firm's website, Rasmussen offered this explanation last week:
"We underestimated the minority share of the electorate. In 2008, 26
percent of voters were nonwhite. We expected that to remain relatively
constant. However, in 2012, 28 percent of voters were nonwhite. That
was exactly the share projected by the Obama campaign."
Bolger, meanwhile, offered a more blunt assessment on Public Opinion
Strategies' website. Concluding "that there are too many Democrats" and
a "birth dearth among white voters," Bolger echoed what's become a
common view among Republicans looking at demographic shifts that will
continue to increase the share of blacks and Latinos in the voting
public: "Unless we are a party that is seriously competitive with
Latino voters, we might never win another presidential election again."
S.V. Dáte is congressional editor on NPR's Washington Desk.
Read this and other articles at NPR
|
|
|
|
