Townhall
Modest
Snooping?
Debra J. Saunders
Jun 09, 2013
SAN
JOSE, Calif. -- "Nobody's
listening to your phone calls," President Obama proclaimed at a Friday
event that was supposed to be about California's implementation of the
Affordable Care Act.
But
that morning, the New York
Times had reported that surveillance programs begun under President
George W.
Bush had been clearly "embraced and even expanded under the Obama
administration." The Guardian had reported that the federal government
directed Verizon to provide phone logs on a daily basis, not only of
calls
between the United States and abroad, but also calls "wholly within the
United States, including local telephone calls."
Accordingly,
Times reporter Jackie
Calmes asked the president if he could assure the American people that
the
government doesn't keep "some massive secret database of all their
personal online information and activities."
"You
can't have 100 percent
security and also have 100 percent privacy and zero inconvenience," the
president replied. "We're going to have to make some choices as a
society."
In
defense of the phone
surveillance program, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat,
argued,
"It's called protecting America." The program, wrote Slate's Will
Saleton, "isn't Orwellian. It's limited, and it's controlled by checks
and
balances."
Most
important: House Intelligence
Committee Chairman Mike Rogers maintains that the program helped thwart
a
significant terrorist attack within the United States in the last few
years.
Does
that mean the government
hasn't gone overboard? Obama suggested that the public can trust the
government
because the executive branch acts under the oversight of Congress and
with the
approval of federal judges.
Under
that arrangement, however,
the Department of Justice secretly subpoenaed phone records of
Associated Press
reporters and editors -- the news of which no doubt chilled any
would-be
whistle-blowers left in Washington…
Read
the rest of the article at Townhall
|