US1
Is
There a Trial Lawyer in the House?
by
Ann Coulter
The
only "crisis" in health care in this country is that
doctors are paid too little. (Also they've come up with nothing to
help that poor Dennis Kucinich.)
But
the Democratic Party treats doctors like they're Klan members. They
wail about how much doctors are paid and celebrate the trial lawyers
who do absolutely nothing to make society better, but swoop in and
steal from the most valuable members of society.
Maybe
doctors could get the Democrats to like them if they started suing
their patients.
It's
only a matter of time before the best and brightest students forget
about medical school and go to law school instead. How long can a
society based on suing the productive last?
You
can make 30 times as much money as doctors by becoming a trial lawyer
suing doctors. You need no skills, no superior board scores, no
decade of training and no sleepless residency. But you must have the
morals of a drug dealer. (And the bank wire transfer number to the
Democratic National Committee.)
The
editors of The New York Times have been engaging in a spirited debate
with their readers over whether doctors are wildly overpaid or just
hugely overpaid. The results of this debate are available on
TimeSelect, for just $49.95.
"Many
health care economists," the Times editorialized, say the
partisan wrangling over health care masks a bigger problem: "the
relatively high salaries paid to American doctors."
Citing
the Rand Corp., the Times noted that doctors in the U.S. "earn
two to three times as much as they do in other industrialized
countries." American doctors earn about $200,000 to $300,000 a
year, while European doctors make $60,000 to $120,000. Why, that's
barely enough for Muslim doctors in Britain to buy plastic explosives
to blow up airplanes!
How
much does Pinch Sulzberger make for driving The New York Times stock
to an all-time low? Probably a lot more than your podiatrist.
In
college, my roommate was in the chemistry lab Friday and Saturday
nights while I was dancing on tables at the Chapter House. A few
years later, she was working 20-hour days as a resident at Mount
Sinai doing liver transplants while I was frequenting popular Upper
East Side drinking establishments. She was going to Johns Hopkins for
yet more medical training while I was skiing and following the
Grateful Dead. Now she vacations in places like Rwanda and Darfur
with Doctors Without Borders while I'm going to Paris.
Has
anyone else noticed the nonexistence of a charitable organization
known as "Lawyers Without Borders"?
She
makes $380 for an emergency appendectomy, or one-ten-thousandth of
what John Edwards made suing doctors like her, and one-fourth of what
John Edwards' hairdresser makes for a single shag cut.
Edwards
made $30 million bringing nonsense lawsuits based on junk science
against doctors. To defend themselves from parasites like Edwards,
doctors now pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical
malpractice insurance every year.
But
as the Times would note, doctors in Burkina Faso only get $25 and one
goat per year.
As
long as we're studying the health care systems of various socialist
countries, are we allowed to notice that doctors in these other
countries aren't constantly being sued by bottom-feeding trial
lawyers stealing one-third of the income of people performing useful
work like saving lives?
But
the Democrats (and Fred Thompson) refuse to enact tort reform
legislation to rein in these charlatans. After teachers and welfare
recipients, the Democrats' most prized constituency is trial lawyers.
The ultimate Democrat constituent would be a public schoolteacher on
welfare who needed an abortion and was suing her doctor.
Doctors
graduate at the top of their classes at college and then spend nearly
a decade in grueling work at medical schools. Most doctors don't make
a dime until they're in their early 30s, just in time to start paying
off their six-figure student loans by saving people's lives. They
have 10 times the IQ of trial lawyers and 1,000 times the character.
Yeah,
let's go after those guys. On to nuns next!
But
Times' readers responded to the editorial about doctors being
overpaid with a slew of indignant letters -- not at the Times for
making such an idiotic argument, but at doctors who earn an average
of $200,000 per year. Letter writers praised the free medical care in
places like Spain. ("Nightmare" in the Ann Coulter
dictionary is defined as "having a medical emergency in Spain.")
One
letter-writer proposed helping doctors by having the government take
over another aspect of the economy -- the cost of medical education:
"If
we are to restructure the system by which we pay doctors to match
Europe, which seems prudent as well as inevitable, we must also
finance education as Europeans do, by using state dollars to finance
the full or majority cost of higher education, including professional
school."
And
then to reduce the cost of medical school, the government could
finance "the full or majority cost" of construction costs
of medical schools, and "the full or majority cost" of the
trucks that bring the cement to the construction site and the "the
full or majority cost" of coffee that the truck drivers drink
while hauling the cement and ... it makes my head hurt.
I may
have to see a doctor about this. I should probably get on the waiting
list now in case Hillary gets elected.
That's
how liberals think: To fix an industry bedeviled by government
controls, we'll spread the coercion to yet more industries!
The
only sane letter on the matter, I'm happy to report, came from the
charming town of New Canaan, Conn., which means that I am not the
only normal person who still reads the Times. Ray Groves wrote:
"Last
week, I had the annual checkup for my 2000 Taurus. I paid $95 per
hour for much needed body work. Next month, when I have my own annual
physical, I expect and hope to pay a much higher rate to my primary
care internist, who has spent a significant portion of his life
training to achieve his position of responsibility."
There
is nothing more to say.
Read
this article and more at US1
|