The
Sovereign Man
I for
Inevitable
By
Simon Black
November
5, 2013
[Editor's
Note: What follows was originally published in Notes from the Field
exactly one year ago.]
Just
over 400-years ago today, a group of 13 conspirators were caught
trying to assassinate King James I of England and blow up the House
of Lords in what became known as the Gunpowder Treason.
If
you’ve ever seen the movie V for Vendetta, you know the story. Guy
Fawkes was found underneath the House of Lords with three dozen
barrels of gunpowder… and to this day, his effigy is still burned
annually in commemoration of the event.
Fundamentally,
the Gunpowder Treason was about freedom. The English monarchy at the
time was controlling nearly every aspect of the economy and their
subjects’ lives– from what they could wear to how they could
worship.
“Sumptuary
laws” which regulated private behavior were commonplace. Elizabeth
I, for example, re-introduced a beard tax on all facial hair grown in
excess of two weeks.
She
also published long lists, categorized by social class, dictating
precisely what color and type of garment her subjects were required
to wear.
It
turns out these sumptuary laws were just an early form of
state-sponsored corporate welfare; the English textile industry had
paid Elizabeth huge sums of money in exchange for royal decrees about
knitted caps and woolen socks.
As a
consequence, a great deal of English labor and disposable income was
misallocated towards silly garments instead of being put to more
productive uses… and the country was in an almost perpetual state
of stagnation.
Not
to mention, English finances deteriorated under Elizabeth. By 1600,
state expenditures were 23% greater than tax revenue, which would be
the equivalent of a $550 billion budget deficit in the US today. Not
exactly a trivial figure.
James
I, Elizabeth’s successor, continued to spend extravagantly and
indebt the English economy, often showering taxpayer funds on a
handful of favored nobles.
By
the time James’s successor Charles I came to power, the monarchy’s
credit was running so thin that Charles had to force people to loan
him money; those who refused were imprisoned and had their property
confiscated.
Unsurprisingly,
civil war broke out in 1642. Charles I was executed in 1649, and the
genocidal dictatorship of Oliver Cromwell dominated England for the
next decade.
When
you think about it, this collapse was inevitable.
For
decades prior, the entire English economy was under the control of a
single individual who massively indebted the state, impeded growth,
and reduced people’s individual freedoms. Not exactly a recipe for
long-term success.
The
Gunpowder Treason of November 5, 1605 may have been a failure for the
conspirators, but given enough time, a system so screwed up, so
unsustainable, was destined to collapse on itself.
We’re
not so different in the west today.
We
have our own sumptuary laws, regulating everything from tobacco
consumption to what foods we can/cannot eat. We have our own
state-sponsored corporate welfare. We’re comically indebted.
And
just like the English monarchs, we have a tiny elite that controls
absolutely everything about our economy– taxation, regulation, and
the supply of money.
Needless
to say, this is also unsustainable. And history shows that these
types of unsustainable systems will always collapse under their own
weight.
Is it
wise to think that this time is any different?
Read
this and other articles from the Sovereign Man here
|