Eagles
Rising
Sarah
Palin was Right - Socialized Healthcare Demands Death Panels
By
Onan Coca
14
February 2014
Editor's
note: All statements in the article are supported with links back to
their original sources. You can access this article with links below.
For
years conservatives have been desperately trying to warn the country
about the logical outcomes of embracing socialized healthcare. One of
the first and most important trumpet calls of warning came from
former Alaska Governor and Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin.
“The
America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby
with Down syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s ‘death
panel’ so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective
judgment of their ‘level of productivity in society,’ whether
they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil,”
Palin wrote in 2009.
Almost
immediately, Palin was derided by the left and their defenders in the
media. The “nonpartisan” Politifact (My voice drips with sarcasm
as I say “nonpartisan” – because Politifact has proved
themselves over the years to be overwhelmingly partisan) even gave
Palin a “Pants on Fire” rating for her comments.
Palin
went on to explain why she wholeheartedly believed that Obamacare
would (and MUST) create “death panels.”
obamacare-elderly3“Yesterday
President Obama responded to my statement that Democratic health care
proposals would lead to rationed care; that the sick, the elderly and
the disabled would suffer the most under such rationing; and that
under such a system, these ‘unproductive’ members of society
could face the prospect of government bureaucrats determining whether
they deserve health care,” Palin wrote in a note on her Facebook
page.
“The
provision that President Obama refers to is Section 1233 of HR 3200,
entitled ‘Advance Care Planning Consultation.’ With all due
respect, it’s misleading for the president to describe this section
as an entirely voluntary provision that simply increases the
information offered to Medicare recipients,” she continued.
“Section
1233 authorizes advanced care planning consultations for senior
citizens on Medicare every five years, and more often ‘if there is
a significant change in the health condition of the individual ... or
upon admission to a skilled nursing facility, a long-term care
facility... or a hospice program.’"
In
hindsight, using the term “death panels” may have been a bad
idea, not because it was wrong, but because it invited the
incredulity of liberal mockers. It also made it easier for Democrats
and their minions to convince average Americans that Republicans were
simply fearmongering – when in truth, the death panels are simply
the logical outcome of Obamacare. When you move from a private to
public system, all of a sudden funds become finite and hard choices
must be made because patients no longer have the same options that
they did when they could privately fund their healthcare.
Don’t
believe me? Almost five years since Palin’s “death panels”
claim even Democrats and the same liberal media that first laughed at
the idea are now agreeing that death panels exist.
Cynthia
Tucker of the Atlanta Journal Constitution admits “Death Panels”
exist, just a few short years after calling Palin a liar for the same
claim.
Liberal
rag, Slate, also agrees that death panels are real… and that they
are a “GOOD THING”.
Popular
liberal economist, Paul Krugman is on board with Slate – “Death
panels and sales taxes is how we do this.”
Liberal
journalist and author of the anti-Palin book “Game Change” Mark
Halperin admits that “Death Panels” are written explicitly into
the Obamacare law.
rattnerFormer
Vermont Governor and popular socialist Democrat Howard Dean is happy
to admit that Death Panels exist.
That
should be enough to vindicate Sarah Palin. If you need more there are
many more instances of Democrats admitting to their former lies.
Perhaps some of you still can’t wrap your head around how this
could happen. Perhaps some of you moderate, squishy, fence-sitting
voters just can’t believe that Democrats would lie to you like
this. Please allow me to help you with this.
The
problem is that you are a schmuck. And the Democrats know this about
you. So they resort to ad hominem attacks on Republicans and they
refuse to argue over issues. Instead they say things like – “War
on Women!” or “Republicans are Racist!” or “We are the 99%!”
or “Republicans are all Rich White People who HATE poor people!”
You
are a schmuck and you buy their crap. You buy it as fast as they can
shovel it.
Perhaps
next time instead of just buying their quick and easy lines (“War
on Women!”), you should actually think and logically consider what
the argument might really be about
Let
me give you just one more practical example.
Socialized
healthcare MUST be rationed because there is a finite amount of
resources, and those resources cannot cover everyone’s health and
wellness. They just can’t. Because of this, some hard decisions
have to be made by healthcare providers – without the consent or
desires of the patients playing any role.
In
England such a case is being played out in graphic and sad display.
A
six year old little girl with cerebral palsy has been denied an
operation that would help her walk – because of BUDGET CUTS. The
little girl can only shuffle her feet or take a few small steps with
help. The operation that was planned would loosen her muscles and
allow her the ability to walk on her own. The little girl has already
undergone over a year of painful procedures to prepare her body for
the operation that has now been cancelled. They now have to raise
thousands of dollars to have the operation done privately – perhaps
in the United States.
Don’t
be surprised when you start hearing more stories like this – but
instead of happening in England, they’ll be taking place here.
Schmucks.
Read
this article with links at Eagles Rising
|