Redstate
Faith
and Work
By:
Erick Erickson
March
26th, 2014
There
are moments when I am reminded that there are two Americas.
Increasingly those Americas are divided by faith and lack of faith —
or at least ignorance of faith. Yesterday was one of those days when
a friend emailed me this tweet by Brian Beutler of the left-wing
trolling site Salon (though soon to be at the credible left-wing site
The New Republic).
Beutler
asked, in his tweet, “For what practical reasons might a
corporation adopt a religious identity other than to burden
employees, customers, competitors etc?” He followed it up later by
stating, “Getting lots of derp … but nobody arguing that
religious entrepreneurs were harmed all the years they lacked this
right.”
Beutler,
in two tweets, exposes blinding ignorance, but is a voice respected
by the left and who helps shape the opinions of others. On the
second, no one is arguing religious entrepreneurs were harmed “all
the years they lacked” the right to operate as religious for the
very reason that up until now they’ve been left alone.
It is
only now, but with compulsion to bake cakes for gay weddings and
provide funding to subsidize abortions, etc. that we are having this
fight. Christians assumed they had the right, the state left them
alone, and everyone went about their business.
Secondly,
Beutler, like some of his former colleagues at the leftwing Talking
Points Memo, has seemingly failed to grasp that the issue at stake in
the Hobby Lobby case is not about the First Amendment per se, but
about the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The question is whether
it applies to corporations as well as individuals. Undoubtedly, a
corporation with a First Amendment right to speech has one related to
free exercise of religion. The justices yesterday seemed overwhelming
predisposed to that.
More
troubling, however, Beutler cannot understand why any individuals
would set up a corporation to be run faithful to their religion
except to burden “employees, customers, competitors, etc.” This
speaks more to Beutler’s hostility toward sincere faith than
anything else. His supposition going in to the argument is that “the
only practical reason” is to burden others. Again, he is a voice on
the left who helps others form their own opinions
In
fact, practicing evangelical Protestant Christians believe in a
“Doctrine of Vocation.” In his work God at Work, Gene Edward
Veith, Jr., puts it this way, “”The priesthood of all believers”
did not make everyone into church workers; rather, it turned every
kind of work into a sacred calling.” Further,
The
purpose of vocation is to love and serve one’s neighbor. This is
the test, the criterion, and the guide for how to live out each and
every vocation anyone can be called to: How does my calling serve my
neighbor? Who are my neighbors in my particular vocation, and how can
I serve them with the love of God?
As
Gustaf Wingren stated it in a different way, “God does not need our
good works, but our neighbor does.” God compels us to glorify Him,
and we are to do that even in our work. Our work is as a missionary
and witness for him. Some do it better than others. None do it
perfectly. We are all sinners. We all stumble. But we are to glorify
God through our vocation nonetheless.
Not
even thirty years ago this idea of Christian vocation would not be
controversial, nor would it be a foreign concept. But now, as the
nation drifts further and further from the church, the old is
becoming new again. I can assure Brian Beutler that Christians do not
wish to operate their businesses as a burden to others, but as a
blessing. Hobby Lobby is a great example of that. The corporation
pays its workers well above minimum wage, it closes earlier than its
competitors each day, it closes on Sunday, and it gives solid
benefits — medical, dental, and retirement...
Read
the rest of the aticle at Redstate
|