Heritage
Foundation
The
Benghazi Select Committee Has Been Established. Why That's a Good
Thing.
Helle
Dale
May
9, 2014
On
Thursday, the U.S. House of Representatives voted, 232-186, to
establish an investigative Select Committee on Benghazi. The
committee, which will consist of seven Republicans and five
Democrats, is a welcome if overdue step toward getting to the truth
about the terrorist attack on Sept. 11, 2012, which left four
Americans dead, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens.
The
committee was established with bipartisan support—seven Democrats
crossed party lines to vote for it. And hopefully, the committee will
be a bipartisan effort. It should concern all Americans, regardless
of their politics, that Americans died in Benghazi and their
government failed to protect them.
It
is not surprising Americans overwhelmingly believe Congress needs to
stay on the case. We already know the State Department under Hillary
Clinton failed to provide the level of security our diplomats in
Libya continuously asked for as Benghazi became increasingly
dangerous in the spring and summer of 2012. State then failed to
request military assistance when the terrorists launched their attack
on the diplomatic facility, even as Ambassador Stevens and his staff
were begging for help via radio and cell phones. In the aftermath,
the administration concocted a phony story about the attack—one
that contradicted facts already known at State, the Department of
Defense and the CIA. Finally, the administration stonewalled
congressional investigations to the point of intimidating
whistleblowers who wanted to come forward with their stories.
House
Speaker John Boehner has appointed Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), a former
prosecutor, as chairman of the Select Committee, a choice that
suggest seriousness of purpose. As a member of the House Oversight
and Government Reform Committee, Gowdy has been one of the toughest
questioners on Benghazi, though constrained like everyone else by the
five minutes members are allotted to question witnesses during most
congressional hearings. Depending on its governing rules, a select
committee will allow for probing more lines of questioning and have
greater subpoena powers.
Predictably,
Obama spokesmen and surrogates have had nothing but disparagement for
the decision to go forward with a select committee. But the
administration has only itself to blame for the continued outrage
over Benghazi.
Read
this and other articles with links and photos at Heritage Foundation
|