|
|
The
views expressed
on this page are soley those of the author and do not
necessarily
represent the views of County News Online
|
|
The Daily Signal
The
Conservative Problem With the Latest Version of No Child Left Behind
Kelsey Harkness
February 25, 2015
This week, the House of Representatives will vote on an ambitious
rewrite of the No Child Left Behind Act, which is the most far-reaching
K-12 federal education law ever created.
Under consideration is a 620-page proposal called the Student Success
Act (H.R. 5), which Republican leadership says will scale back
Washington’s involvement in local education.
But conservatives say the measure doesn’t go far enough in doing that.
“This proposal spends nearly as much as No Child Left Behind, is nearly
as long in page length, and fails to give states an option to opt out
of the law,” said Lindsey Burke, The Heritage Foundation’s Will
Skillman Fellow in Education. “As it stands, it’s a huge missed
opportunity to restore state and local control of education.”
Don’t have time to read the Washington Post or New York Times? Then get
The Morning Bell, an early morning edition of the day’s most important
political news, conservative commentary and original reporting from a
team committed to following the truth no matter where it leads.
The Obama administration also opposes the legislation, fearing that it
would be detrimental to schools nationwide. If the bill were to reach
his desk, the president’s education secretary, Arne Duncan, suggested
that Obama would issue a veto.
“As of today, this isn’t something we could support,” he told a group
of reporters on Monday.
The Student Success Act would consolidate dozens of programs authorized
under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (now known as No Child
Left Behind) and grant states more flexibility in how they use roughly
$2.3 billion federal education dollars.
The problem, conservatives say, is that the legislation only gives
states flexibility within a limited range of the programs that fall
under No Child Left Behind, and more importantly, it does not allow
states to completely opt out of the law, which has long been their goal.
In an effort to fix that, Rep. Mark Walker, R-N.C., and Rep. Ron
DeSantis, R-Fla., introduced an amendment to the Student Success Act
that would allow states to withdraw completely from almost every aspect
of No Child Left Behind—if they so choose.
A-PLUS
“Innovation starts locally—not in Washington,” said Walker of the
conservative amendment, called Academic Partnerships Lead Us to Success
(A-PLUS).
Teachers and parents know best how to meet the
unique needs of their children and students, and we have seen time and
time again that Washington’s top-down approach does not work.
A-PLUS has been introduced in various Congresses and was intended to
provide an alternative to states that did not want to participate in No
Child Left Behind. For years, states have pushed back against No Child
Left Behind due to its mandates and unworkable policies.
DeSantis said the amendment “liberates states from burdensome and
ineffective regulations, providing local communities with the
flexibility to use federal education funding for programs that they
believe will best increase the success of students in the classroom.”
Now, with Republican control of both the House and Senate,
conservatives argue that Congress has an opportunity to gives states a
way out from federal control of K-12 education.
Portability
In addition to allowing states to withdraw from the 80-plus programs
created under No Child Left Behind, conservatives are also advocating
for policies that expand the concept of portability, which is perhaps
the opposition’s biggest point of contention with the Student Success
Act.
As it’s currently written, the Student Success Act would allow states
to make Title I dollars allocated to low-income school districts to be
portable to public and charter schools.
In a perfect world for conservatives, students could use Title I
dollars in a private school of their choice.
In doing so, money could follow a student to an education option that
best suits his or her unique learning needs, which proponents argue
provides students who are trapped in failing schools a way out.
“Title I formula funding is some of the most complex in education law
and all too often, does not reach the students who it was intended to
help,” said Burke. “Portability would move towards funding students
instead of districts and empower families with control over education
policies that affect their children every day.”
Democrats believe portability robs funds from vulnerable, low-income
school districts, and instead directs them to wealthier school
districts that don’t need Title I dollars.
Duncan said the current portability provision included in the Student
Success Act would be “devastating” to the nation’s poorest schools,
stripping them of education funding they can’t afford to lose.
“Rather than helping improve the schools that need it most, the
Republican bill would actually cut investments in these schools while
increasing funds for some of the wealthiest areas in the country,” he
said in a statement.
That approach is backward. We can’t just cut our way
to opportunity. Our kids deserve better. Every child—no matter his or
her ZIP code—deserves a quality education, including access to
high-quality preschool and a fair shot at getting ahead.
Bipartisan Solution?
As an alternative, the Senate Education Committee is drafting their own
version of the Student Success Act, one that they believe could pass
with bipartisan support.
“Bipartisan discussions between [Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.,] and
[Sen. Patty Murray’s, D-Wash.,] staffs on fixing No Child Left Behind
are moving along well, and Sen. Alexander remains positive that they
can reach agreement on key issues,” an aide for Alexander, who chairs
the Senate Education Committee, told The Daily Signal yesterday.
“Sen. Alexander remains positive that they can reach agreement on key
issues. [He] hopes to fix this broken law to help states, school
districts, and schools better serve all students,” she added.
Alexander and Murray have not released details of the proposal.
With the Obama administration already suggesting that the president
would veto the Student Success Act—and the Senate working on their own
bipartisan version—the chances of enacting any legislation that
includes the conservative A-PLUS solution are bleak.
But that won’t stop Walker from trying.
“The president has threatened to veto practically everything under the
sun and yesterday’s veto of Keystone clearly showed he is more
interested in playing politics than working with Congress,” said
Walker, adding:
Parents and teachers—not government
bureaucrats—should have the ultimate say in education. They know best
how to meet the unique needs of their children and students. A-PLUS
further empowers states and offers greater flexibility in federal
education spending. It is smart, conservative education reform that
strengthens the broader goal of the Student Success Act to remove the
federal government from classrooms.
Read this and other articles at the Daily Signal
|
|
|
|
