|
|
The
views expressed
on this page are soley those of the author and do not
necessarily
represent the views of County News Online
|
 |
The Daily Signal
9 Reasons Why
Obama Just Made Wrong Decision on Keystone Pipeline
Nicolas Loris
November 06, 2015
It took President Barack Obama only 2,604 days to reject the permit
application for the Keystone XL pipeline.
In a statement today, Obama said the pipeline “would not serve the
national interest of the United States.”
“America is now a global leader when it comes to taking serious action
to fight climate change,” Obama added. “And frankly, approving this
project would have undercut that global leadership.”
Former Obama administration Secretary of Energy Stephen Chu hit the
nail on the head: “The decision on whether the construction should
happen was a political one and not a scientific one.”
The Daily Signal is the multimedia news organization of The Heritage
Foundation. We’ll respect your inbox and keep you informed.
Here are the top nine reasons Obama is wrong on Keystone XL.
Jobs and economic growth. Opponents will minimize
the job numbers, saying that the pipeline will create only “a handful”
of permanent jobs—and that’s correct. In his speech Obama said, “So if
Congress is serious about wanting to create jobs, this was not the way
to do it.” But here’s what that argument misses: the tens of thousands
of construction jobs that the pipeline project will create. In fact,
simply building the southern portion—which didn’t need Obama’s
approval—has already created 4,000 construction jobs. And if opponents
are dismissive of Keystone XL, they should be dismissive of all
construction projects, as they’re all temporary—because they’re
construction jobs. Further, Keystone XL would add economic value,
transport an important energy resource efficiently, and result in
billions of dollars of tax revenue for states it runs through.
Stable supply of oil from an important trading
partner that will lower gas prices. The pipeline would carry up to
830,000 barrels of oil from Canada to the Gulf Coast, where U.S.
refineries are already equipped to handle heavier crudes. The pipeline
will efficiently provide supply from a secure source and a friendly and
important trading partner. Contra Obama’s claim today that “the
pipeline would not lower gas prices for American consumers,” increased
oil supplies will lower gas prices, though the impact may be small.
Safest mode of getting oil and gas to Americans.
Many in the United States live near a pipeline without even knowing
about it. America has more than 500,000 miles of crude oil, petroleum,
and natural gas pipelines and another 2 million miles of natural gas
distribution pipelines. When it comes to accidents, injuries, and
fatalities, pipelines are the safest mode of transporting oil and gas.
Should be a business decision, not a government one.
In concluding with Secretary of State John Kerry’s assessment that the
project would not be in the national interest, Obama said, “The
pipeline would not make a meaningful long-term contribution to our
economy.” It is not the role of the federal government to make
that determination. The federal government shouldn’t make that
determination with the construction of a new restaurant or boutique
shop. And it shouldn’t make that determination with a pipeline. After
the State Department concluded that the pipeline was environmentally
safe, the decision to build Keystone XL should have been a business
decision—not a government one.
We’ve done this before. The Keystone XL Pipeline is
just a portion of the larger Keystone Pipeline System. Unbeknownst to
many is the fact that the U.S. has already granted one of those
presidential permits for the Keystone Pipeline System. For phase I of
the Keystone Pipeline System, TransCanada filed an application with the
Department of State (DOS) in April 2006, and the department began an
environmental review in September 2006. TransCanada received its
presidential permit for phase I in March 2008. From beginning to end,
the process took 23 months. It has taken 86 months for Obama to
say no.
Environmentally safe. It was Albert Einstein who
said the definition of insanity is “doing the same thing over and over
again and expecting different results.” The State Department must be
teetering on the edge of insanity, because after multiple environmental
reviews concluding that Keystone XL poses minimal environmental risk to
soil, wetlands, water resources, vegetation, fish, and wildlife, the
Obama administration still rejected the permit application.
Negligible climate impact. In a speech in June 2013,
Obama said the climate effects of Keystone XL would have a major impact
on the administration’s decision. These effects, however, would be
minimal. The State Department’s final environmental impact statement
concludes that the Canadian oil is coming out of the ground whether
Keystone XL is built or not, so the difference in greenhouse gas
emissions is minuscule. No matter your position on climate change,
Keystone XL won’t make a difference.
Can be built without the help of the taxpayer.
Building and operating Keystone XL will result in real private-sector
jobs that will grow the U.S. economy. This is very different from the
president’s taxpayer-funded green jobs plan that merely siphons
resources out of the market and forces pricier energy on the American
public.
The people want it. Lots of people want it. A CNN
poll in the beginning of the year found that 57 percent of Americans
support the project, while just 28 percent oppose it. Many unions want
it. Former Secretary of Interior Ken Salazar called the project a
“win-win.” Congress sent a bill to Obama’s desk, demonstrating
their will to approve the project. Sadly, the Obama administration is
catering to the small group of radical environmental activists who
don’t want the pipeline.
Last April, the Washington Post slammed the Obama administration’s
continued delay of a Keystone XL decision, calling it “absurd” and
“embarrassing.” Rejecting the permit application is even more absurd
and more embarrassing.
Read this and other articles with links at The Daily Signal
|
|
|
|
