|
|
The
views expressed
on this page are soley those of the author and do not
necessarily
represent the views of County News Online
|
The Daily Signal
8 Conservative
Policies That Will Reduce Poverty
Mark Erste & Rachel Sheffield
March 16, 2016
According to a new Associated Press/NORC poll, 72 percent of Americans
rate “reducing poverty” as “extremely” or “very important.” This
includes 62 percent of Republicans, 63 percent of Independents, and 85
percent of Democrats. Further, 62 percent of Americans rate “reforming
welfare” as “extremely” or “very important.” Americans are right: It is
time for a change.
Although the left continues to advocate for increased welfare spending,
more money is not the answer. Combined federal and state means-tested
welfare spending continues to grow and now tops $1 trillion per year.
This works out to about $20,000 for every person under the poverty line.
The War on Poverty has expensively failed to increase self-sufficiency.
As we have argued previously, and as numerous Heritage Foundation
reports demonstrate, the War on Poverty has expensively failed to
increase self-sufficiency. Heritage senior research fellow Robert
Rector writes that “taxpayers have spent $22 trillion on [President
Lyndon B.] Johnson’s war [on poverty]. Adjusted for inflation, that’s
three times the cost of all military wars since the American
Revolution.” Yet despite this spending, the poverty rate has hovered
between 10 and 15 percent for the last 40 years.
Ever-increasing spending has not solved the problem. As President
Ronald Reagan said: “We fought a war on poverty, and poverty won.” It’s
time to adopt a different strategy to fight poverty.
In a new paper Rector and Sheffield lay out the conservative way
forward:
Get the Goals Right – Welfare should be about putting low-income
individuals on the path to self-sufficiency, helping people achieve the
ability to support themselves and their families. It should not be
about throwing an ever-increasing amount of money at the symptoms of
poverty.
Get the Facts Right – Since welfare spending is split up among 80
means-tested welfare programs spread across multiple government
agencies the welfare system’s $1 trillion price tag is easily hidden.
Congress should list this total cost in their budgets. Further, when
the government measures poverty, it does not count welfare benefits.
So, no matter how much the government spends on antipoverty programs it
still appears that roughly 50 million Americans live in poverty.
Official poverty estimates should count these benefits when measuring
poverty.
Require Work – The vast majority of Americans believe that able-bodied
adults who receive government welfare benefits should have to work or
prepare for work. Nevertheless most welfare programs do not require
work for able-bodied adults. Work was at the heart of the successful
1996 welfare reform and it should be at the heart of any 21st century
reform as well.
Promote Marriage – Over 40 percent of children are born outside of
marriage today. Tragically, these children are over five times as
likely to be poor compared to children in married-parent homes. Yet we
have largely replaced fathers with a welfare check, a check that
mothers may lose if they marry. We should take steps to reduce marriage
penalties in the welfare system and should also work to rebuild a
culture of marriage in low-income communities.
Reject the Pseudo-Federalism of Welfare Block Grants – Over 75 percent
of government means-tested welfare spending is federal. Sending federal
dollars to the states in the form block-grants – simply handing
taxpayer dollars down from one level of government to another – is a
perfect recipe for unaccountability and is not true federalism. Real
federalism would mean states using their own dollars to pay for
welfare. One way to promote federalism would be to require states to
take financial responsibility for public housing programs.
Prevent Fraud – According to the IRS, over 20 percent of payments under
the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) are fraudulent. Income verification
and tighter eligibility would greatly reduce this problem. Further,
many welfare recipients fail to report jobs in order to maintain
welfare benefits. A work requirement eliminates this fraud because
recipients cannot be at a reported job and an unreported job at the
same time.
Pay for Performance – The welfare system includes many educational
initiatives, training programs and social services. A portion of the
funding for entities performing these services could be tied to
effectiveness.
Create Opportunity – Some recipients, like former inmates, cannot get a
job. Providing incentives for businesses to invest in these individuals
helps open doors to job experience that can give them a better shot at
the American dream.
The American people sense that it is time for a change. As Congress
considers reforming our safety net, we should keep in mind these common
sense principles. With these effective strategies we can develop policy
that actually meets the needs of low-income Americans.
Read this and other articles at The Daily Signal
|
|
|
|
