|
|
 |
|
The
views expressed
on this page are soley those of the author and do not
necessarily
represent the views of County News Online
|
 |
The Daily Signal
Why Pulling ‘To
Kill a Mockingbird’ From the Classroom Hurts Students
Daniel Davis
October 18, 2017
This year, as in years past, eighth-graders in Biloxi, Mississippi,
began reading the classic American novel “To Kill a Mockingbird.”
And then, partway through and with little warning, they stopped.
Why? Because, according to the school board vice president, it “makes
people uncomfortable.”
If you attended American schools within the last few decades, chances
are you read Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird.” It is a staple of
American literature and a world-renowned classic, having sold 40
million copies since its first publication in 1960.
Americans need an alternative to the mainstream media. But this can't
be done alone. Find out more >>
It also won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction in 1961, and the book’s
dramatic on-screen portrayal in 1962 cemented its fame.
America has overwhelmingly embraced “To Kill a Mockingbird,” so its
sudden rejection in Biloxi, Mississippi, is noteworthy. And yet, in our
day of hypersensitivity and student coddling, it’s hard to be
completely shocked at this.
The concern that drove the school board’s decision is clear: “To Kill a
Mockingbird” contains some content that is shocking and will indeed
make some students uneasy.
Of course, this is by design. Set in 1930s Alabama, the book is replete
with use of the N-word and other racial epithets. The entire culture
portrayed in the book is marked by prejudice toward African-Americans,
with the exception of the main protagonists.
Since the book is a social commentary on racism in the Jim Crow South,
this is to be expected.
Yet this is what administrators in Biloxi want to shield their students
from.
“[We] can teach the same lesson with other books,” Kenny Holloway, the
school board’s vice president, told the Sun Herald, a Mississippi
newspaper. “It’s still in our library. But they’re going to use another
book in the eighth-grade course.”
Having read this book aloud with my own fellow students back in the
ninth grade—bleeping out the N-word all the way through—I get the
dilemma. This book is not for the fainthearted. Certain characters
openly demean the dignity of African-Americans. Evil is put on full
display.
But that is exactly the point, and it’s what the Biloxi school board
fails to grasp.
There is grave injustice in our world. And in order to confront those
things as citizens, young people must be morally well-formed. They need
to learn what evil is, and then be shaped into the kinds of people who
can live out virtue for the betterment of society.
This does not come naturally for us. Human beings are born ignorant,
narrow, and morally incompetent. The whole purpose of education is to
move young people out of their infantile state into moral and
intellectual maturity. It’s a process of liberation.
But students will never reach the point of liberation if their teachers
shield them from evil.
Part of moral maturity is being able to stare evil in the face, to look
on it with mourning, and to respond by doing what is right—even at
great personal cost.
That’s the kind of maturity embodied by Atticus Finch, a main
protagonist in “To Kill a Mockingbird.” This man stared evil in the
face and, at great cost to himself, made a stand for justice.
If our students can’t even read lines from “To Kill a Mockingbird,” how
do we expect them to grow up into the kinds of Atticus Finches we want
serving our society?
The great irony is that in shielding their students from
“uncomfortable” things, school administrators are not actually
protecting them. They are consigning them to lives of moral weakness
and mediocrity, and doing a disservice to society as a whole.
The other irony, of course, is that “To Kill a Mockingbird,” with its
“uncomfortable” language, was a tremendous force for good in the 20th
century. It played a role in moving public opinion toward the cause of
civil rights.
A similar dynamic played out with “Uncle Tom’s Cabin,” a book that
contained even more severe scenes of brutality against blacks. That
book helped fuel the abolitionist movement in the 1850s.
Were the readers of these books scandalized? Were their consciences
marred beyond repair? Would they have been better off sticking to more
polite literature?
If America is a better place today because of abolition and the civil
rights movement, then we should rejoice that these books were widely
read. And heaven forbid we should see ourselves as somehow above them.
The task of education is the task of citizen-making, and in an
important sense, soul-making. If we want to mold students into citizens
who are morally competent, then we must lead them out of infancy by
helping them grow thick skin and large souls.
Sometimes, that just means making them “uncomfortable.”
Read this and other articles at The Daily Signal
|
|
|
|
