Cincinnati
Enquirer...
Taxpayers
funding benefits for
big-company, government retirees
Health care law subsidizes coverage
until Medicare age
Aug. 24, 2011
WASHINGTON
- Greater Cincinnati
employers - including large companies and local governments - are
getting
millions of taxpayer dollars to help pay for health care benefits for
early
retirees, people who are often at risk of losing health care until they
qualify
for Medicare.
Cincinnati-based
Procter & Gamble,
Kroger Co., Western and Southern Life Insurance Company and Cincinnati
Bell are
among the local companies who are using taxpayer dollars to subsidize
health
insurance benefits for their employees.
•
Find out which organizations have
received funding through the Early Retirement Reinsurance Program
So
are other Ohio employers, from
Columbus-based American Electric Power and Cleveland-based KeyCorp to
the
Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio and Sheet Metal Workers
Local 24 in
Cincinnati.
The
state of Kentucky also received
millions, along with dozens of companies, school districts and cities
in
Indiana.
The
$5 billion Early Retirement
Reinsurance Program is a little-known provision of last year’s health
care
reform law that was designed to encourage companies to provide health
care to
early retirees, which are people who retire in their 50s or early 60s
before
Medicare benefits kick in at age 65. Many people between 50 and 64 have
health
issues that can make it difficult to get affordable coverage on their
own.
The
program is supposed to fill that
coverage gap by encouraging employers to extend coverage for this group
of
people until a provision in the the health law kicks in that would ban
insurers
from denying coverage for pre-existing health conditions.
Critics,
however, call it an
unnecessary bailout for local governments or a corporate “slush fund,”
particularly for the large Fortune 500 companies that are benefiting.
“Why
in the flip are you giving out so
much money of taxpayers so freely and overwhelmingly to companies that
are very
profitable?” Rep. Cliff Stearns, a Florida Republican, asked at a
hearing he
held in April.
Companies
didn’t have to demonstrate
financial need to apply; they just had to have a health care program
for early retirees
and have to maintain those benefits until 2014.
Steve
Larsen, deputy administrator of
consumer information and insurance oversight at the Center for Medicare
and
Medicaid Services, said that the program grew out of concern that early
retirees would lose health insurance unless their employers got
subsidies.
Only
28 percent of large firms offered
retiree health coverage last year, down from 66 percent in 1988,
according to
the Kaiser Family Foundation.
“We
want to make sure that companies
that are currently providing early retiree benefits continue to do so,”
Larsen
said. “And this program helps ensure that they do that.”
P&G:
An ‘obligation to our
shareholders’
The
program was supposed to run until
2014, when major aspects of the health overhaul law kick in, including
a ban
against insurers denying coverage for a pre-existing health condition.
Many
people between 50 and 64 have health issues that can make it difficult
to get
affordable coverage on their own, according to the administration.
The
early retiree program, however,
stopped accepting applications in May after spending roughly half its
funds in
less than a year. It could run out of money next year unless Congress
approves
additional funding.
The
program has paid out nearly $142
million to 64 Ohio employers as of June 10. About half went to the
Public
Employees Retirement System of Ohio. Procter & Gamble, which
makes
household items like detergent and diapers, received $6.6 million - the
most of
any company in Ohio. Cincinnati Bell got $1.9 million; Western and
Southern
Life Insurance Company got $1.1 million; and supermarket giant Kroger
got
$678,167.
Christine
Wever, a spokeswoman for
Procter & Gamble, pointed out that more than half of all
Fortune 500
companies, all major unions and governments from all 50 states have
submitted
applications and received payments from the program.
“The
money P&G has received
through this program has supported our efforts to continue offering
these
important health care benefits to our retirees and their families,” she
said.
“While P&G did not advocate the establishment of this program
... we have
an obligation to our shareholders to participate in cost-savings
programs when
they are made available to us.”
Cincinnati
Bell said in a statement
that it has about 2,400 retirees with health care coverage and funds
from the
program “help partially offset the rising costs of providing” that
coverage.
Spokesmen
at Kroger and Western and
Southern Life Insurance Company did not respond to requests for comment.
Nine
employers in Kentucky received
$65 million, although most of that amount went to state government,
which got
$63.4 million. Some 63 employers in Indiana received about $16 million,
including Columbus-based Cummins, which got $3.4 million, the most
among all
recipients in the state.
Indiana’s
Cummins capped the amount it
would pay for retiree health benefits in 1996 and since then all
increases in
cost have been passed along to the retirees, said Janet Williams,
spokeswoman
for the diesel engine maker.
Williams
said the $3.4 million Cummins
has received will be used to recalculate retirees’ share of health
insurance
costs and reduce their costs. More than 10,000 people are covered by
Cummins’
retiree health care program.
Outside
the Tristate area, some
corporations have received even larger payments. Telephone services
provider
AT&T has received $141.5 million, more than any other private
company.
Verizon ranks second with $91.7 million, followed by GE’s $36.6 million
and
Boeing’s $34.1 million.
Gannett
Corp., the parent company of
The Cincinnati Enquirer and 10 other newspapers throughout Ohio, got
$938,551.
‘A
big-business subsidy’
Rep.
Steve Chabot, a Westwood
Republican, said this is one of several provisions in the health care
law that
may need further examination.
“Earlier
this year I voted for a full
repeal of the health care law that was passed during the last
Congress,” Chabot
said. “While it was clear that our health care system needed reform,
there are
numerous provisions within this law that I, and a majority of
Americans, are
not comfortable with.”
Other
local lawmakers contacted for
this story declined to comment.
Ed
Haislmaier, a health policy expert
at the conservative-leaning Heritage Foundation based in Washington,
said the
program unfairly favors large companies because to qualify for the
subsidy,
companies must already offer early-retiree benefits. Small companies
usually
don’t, he said.
“It’s
very much a big-business
subsidy,” he said. “There are a lot more people out there who don’t get
this
who will resent it, and they should.”
But
Timothy Jost, a health care expert
and law professor at Washington and Lee University in Lexington, Va.,
said the
program benefits retirees whose out-of-pocket insurance premiums might
not be
affordable.
“It’s
not intended to be a welfare
program for companies,” Jost said. “Rather, it’s a program to help
retirees,
many of whom are in need and virtually all of whom would be in need if
their
retiree health benefits were terminated.”
Other
critics have focused on the
program’s payments to state and local governments, which accounted for
56
percent of all payments last year, according to Republicans on the
House
commerce committee’s oversight panel. The subsidy amounts to a bailout
for
local governments, some Republicans say.
In
Ohio, the Public Employees
Retirement System received $70.5 million, or about half of the total
that went
to the state. In Kentucky, state government got nearly all of the
state’s
share.
Julie
Graham-Price, a spokeswoman for
PERS, said the federal program has helped Ohio provide health care
benefits to
public employees who retire before they are eligible for Medicare. Last
year,
more than 179,000 retired Ohioans got health care through PERS,
including early
retirees, she said.
“Nearly
90 percent of those retirees
live in Ohio spending the vast majority of that money on goods and
services in
the state,” she said.
Tim
Longmeyer, secretary of the
personnel cabinet for Kentucky, said the state applied for the funding
as soon
as it was available.
“We’ve
been very aggressive in
pursuing this program,” he said. “This funding allows us to provide
better
benefits at a lower cost than we otherwise would have. In tough
economic times,
it really helps tremendously.”
In
Kentucky, about 300,000 public
employees and family members, including 45,000 early retirees, benefit
from the
health care plan. Because the premiums are pooled across the board, the
extra
funding benefits everyone, from teachers and police officers to
prosecutors and
cabinet secretaries, Longmeyer said.
In
Indiana, more than 170 schools and
local governments have been accepted into the program, compared to the
67
businesses and unions that are benefiting.
Read
it at the Cincinnati Enquirer
|