New York Times...
In Ohio, a New Governor Is Off to
a
Smooth Start
By Sabrina Tavernise
Published: July 1, 2011
In
Washington, Congress may still be
fighting over the national budget, but in Ohio, where Republicans
control the
House, the Senate and the governor’s office, the budget passage has
been about
as smooth as a knife through butter.
That
is partly because Republicans
kept tight party unity, voting together on bills that Democrats say are
some of
the most conservative the state has ever seen. But the driving force
was Ohio’s
governor, John R. Kasich (pronounced KAY-sik), who has pressed his
legislative
agenda with remarkable success since his election in November.
On
Thursday night, he signed his $56
billion budget into law, with few major changes from the version he had
originally proposed and neatly ahead of a July 1 deadline. On Friday,
he held a
news conference in Columbus to celebrate.
“We
faced our problems and took them
on,” Mr. Kasich said. “We have now stabilized the state. It is a new
way, and
it is a new day and, we are delivering.”
It
was a fireworks finale to a
legislative season steered by Mr. Kasich, who is among the closely
watched
class of new Republican governors in key electoral battle-ground
states. His
stewardship of the state budget could have outsize political
implications,
influencing the mood of voters and their economic circumstances, which
will
help set the backdrop for next year’s presidential election.
In
his five months in office, Mr.
Kasich, a former congressman and Lehman Brothers executive, has
established
himself as a get-things-done governor who has expansive powers and is
not
afraid to use them.
“Inning
after inning, the guy scored
every round,” said Gene Beaupre, a political science professor at
Xavier
University in Cincinnati. “I don’t see where he lost anything in the
budget
game.”
Mr.
Kasich said at the news conference
that the budget restored fiscal responsibility to Ohio by closing an $8
billion
budget gap. But his opponents argue that it accomplished that through
deep cuts
in spending on schools and local governments, which will be hard
pressed to
make up the difference. It also repeals the estate tax in 2013, which
applies
to the most affluent Ohioans and is another important revenue source
for local
governments.
“There
are clear winners and losers in
this budget,” said Wendy Patton, senior associate at Policy Matters
Ohio, a
liberal economic research group in Columbus. “Wealthy families and
businesses
benefit. School kids and communities don’t.”
Michael
Leachman, assistant director
of the state fiscal project at the Center on Budget and Policy
Priorities, said
Mr. Kasich’s approach was not unlike that of other closely watched
Republican
governors, like Scott Walker of Wisconsin and Rick Scott of Florida:
cutting
spending and taxes as a way to increase jobs. The effort, he argued,
would harm
the economy by reducing consumer spending.
Mr.
Kasich argued that the tax cuts
were critical in an era when Ohio’s economy had been “dying.” Avoiding
tax
increases “is not ideological,” he said. “Ohio is not competitive. We
wanted to
become business-friendly.”
Bill
Seitz, a Republican state senator
from Cincinnati who voted for the budget because he said it advanced
many
long-overdue changes to, for example, prisons and the administrations
of cities
and towns, expressed concern that the cuts from local governments
amounted to
shifting the burden onto towns and cities.
“It’s
easy to spend other people’s
money, and that is essentially what this budget does,” he said. “Local
governments will likely be in a position to ask voters for additional
resources. It’s pay me now or pay me later.”
Senate
President Thomas E. Niehaus
said in a telephone interview that local governments would soon have
fresh
revenues from casinos that had been approved by voters, and Mr. Kasich
said
they would also have savings from public-sector worker salaries and
benefits
under Senate Bill 5, a law passed this spring that weakens those
workers’ right
to bargain collectively.
But
Democrats say that that tool might
not be an option, as a campaign is under way to repeal the law, and
that,
together with the other conservative legislation that has passed,
including
controversial changes to voting rules and a provision banning public
hospitals
from performing abortions, the measures might backfire at the polls.
“They
are appealing to the most
aggressive, energetic, loudest portion of the Republican Party,” said
Tim
Burke, chairman of the Hamilton County Democratic Party. “I think there
is a
very real possibility that they will be made to pay for all of that,
come next
year.”
But
Ohio is a swing state, and the
real question, Mr. Beaupre said, is how independent voters will react,
and that
is still too early to predict.
A
repeal of Senate Bill 5 “does not
necessarily translate into voter behavior in 2012,” he said. “It’s all
still
squishy at this point.”
Read
it at the New York Times
|