Foxnews.com...
As
Deadline Nears, Debt Reduction
Panel Weighs Undoing Its Own Rules
November 13, 2011
With
10 days left until an automatic
trigger for debt reduction, the Super Committee tasked with finding a
plan to
get rid of $1.2 trillion in impending debt over the next 10 years may
have to
punt.
Six
Democrats and six Republicans
appointed to the panel -- itself a source of contention among
colleagues and
transparency advocates -- have
until
Nov. 23 to find the balance that will get past Congress by Dec. 23 and
onto
President Obama’s desk. Without a deal by Thanksgiving, automatic
across-the-board cuts divided between defense and domestic programs,
also known
as “sequestration,” kick in.
“I
am not giving up on getting something
done. I think we still can and I am going to do everything to achieve
that,”
said Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., one of the Super Committee members.
“In
the very unfortunate event that we
don’t, I think it is very likely Congress will reconsider configuration
of that
sequestration and consider if this is the best way to do it. I think it
will be
a lively debate that will occur and the nature of those cuts. If the
cuts have
to occur they might occur in a different fashion.”
Toomey,
a tax hawk who formerly ran
the fiscally conservative Club for Growth, acknowledged that “the clock
is
running out.”
“But
it hasn’t run out yet. We still
have time, but we have no time to waste,” Toomey told “Fox News Sunday.”
Rep.
James Clyburn, D-S.C., also a
member of the panel, said while he was hopeful for a deal, “I am not as
certain
as I was 10 days ago, but I think that we can.”
That’s
not what lawmakers or the
public were counting on when the trigger was included as part of a deal
cut
this summer between congressional Republicans and the White House to up
the
debt ceiling.
The
co-chairman of the panel on Sunday
called the deliberations a “roller coaster ride.” Rep. Jeb Hensarling,
R-Texas,
who appeared on CNN, also offered no clues about whether a deal could
be struck
by the deadline.
“We
haven’t given up hope,” he said.
So
what’s stopping a deal? The amount
of taxes to be raised and spending to be cut.
Republicans
and Democrats are coming
to the table with very different plans. The Republicans have reportedly
offered
$700 billion in spending cuts and $500 billion in revenue increases.
The
revenues would come from $250 billion in fewer deductions for top
income tax
filers. In exchange, the highest tax rates -- now at 35 percent but
expected to
rise to 39.6 percent in 2013 -- would drop down to 28 percent.
Democrats
have offered a one-to-one
ratio of spending cuts to revenue increases. It would seem the two,
then, are
pretty close. And yet, they’re still bickering.
Republicans
contend closing the
loopholes and lowering the rate would create a net gain for the
government. But
Democrats say it would cost more than the $3 billion that higher tax
rates
would attract.
Clyburn
said allowing billionaires to
catch any breaks isn’t fair.
“I
think it is unfair for us to sit
out and say to a person who is making billions of dollars, we’re going
to allow
a tax increase or decrease of another $300,000 a year while we are then
going
to take away Medicare for people living on fixed income. That is just
not
fair,” he said, adding that those in the top 1 percent have seen their
earnings
increase by 275 percent over the past 28 years.
“Let’s
say: come on -- let’s tone this
down and put you where you were 28 years ago relative to the rest of
the
country,” he said.
Clyburn
said he wants to do “some
surgical fixes to entitlements” but that requires going to a bigger
deal.
“I
am a $4 trillion guy,” Clyburn
said. “I do believe we can do this.”
If
the automatic trigger does threaten
to kick in, Obama, who’s traveling in Hawaii and then is headed to the
Asian-Pacific -- and who doesn’t have an executive branch
representative
sitting at the Super Committee table, has said he will veto any measure
that
tries to change the terms of sequestration.
Toomey
said, however, that Congress is
“very likely” to reconsider the triggers, and that would involve “a
lively
debate” but ultimately cuts would occur, however, in some fashion.
Without
that, the dysfunction in Congress will be laid bare both at home and
abroad.
“There
will be further erosion of what
little confidence remains of our federal government,” Toomey said.
But
Clyburn suggested any claims that
a deal won’t get struck are pessimistic.
“About
two-thirds of what Pat Toomey
has put on the table I am for, I’ll tell you. And that may shock you,”
he said.
Read
this and other articles at Fox
News
|