Dayton
Daily News...
Health
section in SB 5 confusing
Bill is unclear on what public workers
should pay for health care
Laura Bischoff
October
21, 2011
COLUMBUS
— The TV ads and campaign
literature from supporters of Senate Bill 5 make it sound simple and
appealing:
Public employees would have to pay at least 15 percent of their health
care
insurance coverage.
But
within the 302-page bill, it isn’t
very clear what that means.
The
section regarding health care for
state workers says they must pay at least 15 percent of their
“premiums.”
Another
section regarding local
workers says no public employer shall agree to union contracts that
require the
employer to pay more than 85 percent of the “cost” paid for health care
benefits.
Local
government groups are scratching
their heads about what should be counted.
Insurance
premiums, wellness programs,
co-pays, deductibles could all be lumped in as health care costs.
“No
clue,” said Susan Cave, executive
director of the Ohio Municipal League when asked what should be
included.
“A
lot of people have asked me that
same question. ‘Premiums’ is pretty clear. ‘Costs’ is not so clear. No
one is
quite sure how this will be interpreted. It was one of the
inconsistencies in
the bill.”
The
Ohio Municipal League, which has
780 members, did not take a position on Senate Bill 5, which will
appear on the
statewide ballot as Issue 2.
Dan
Kaman, spokesman for the state
Department of Administrative Services, said the legislation is written
to give
local jurisdictions flexibility on how to implement the 15 percent
mandate on
health care coverage.
“That
is open to interpretation by the
locals. Since there are different plans out there for the locals, I
imagine
that is why it was written that way,” Kaman said. “It’s a flexibility
issue.”
Jason
Mauk, spokesman for Building a
Better Ohio who also served on the Ohio Senate staff when Senate Bill 5
was
debated and passed, said the 15 percent applies to any health care
costs paid
by the employer on behalf of the worker. “The bottom line is whatever
the
employer is paying for health care, the employee has to pay 15 percent
of it,”
Mauk said. He added, “Some attorneys (against Issue 2) are trying to
play
semantics with this part of the bill to create confusion.”
Opponents
of Senate Bill 5 say there
will be confusion. “There is going to be a lot of unintended
consequences that
will be figured out by attorneys about what 15 percent of health care
costs
means,” said Mark Sanders, president of the Ohio Association of
Professional
Firefighters and a Cincinnati Fire Department lieutenant. In
Cincinnati,
firefighters pay 5 percent of their health care premiums but could end
up
paying more than 15 percent of the total costs if they meet their high
deductible and make co-pays for office visits, he said.
State
Sen. Bill Seitz, R-Cincinnati,
who voted against the bill, said the legislation imposes different
standards on
state and local workers for no logical reason and the 15 is an
arbitrary goal.
The goal should be aligning labor and management to hold down health
care
costs, he said.
Read
this and other articles at the
Dayton Daily News
|