Toledo
Blade...
Obama
campaign fighting Ohio voting
law
Rules on absentee, early votes opposed
By Jim Provance
September 2, 2011
COLUMBUS
-- President Obama’s campaign
sees enough of a threat in Ohio’s new law restricting early and
absentee voting
that it has become involved in what is otherwise an internal state
fight.
If
a current petition effort is
successful, House Bill 194 would be placed on hold until at least after
the
November, 2012, presidential election.
With
30 percent of all Ohio votes in the
2008 presidential election cast before the polls opened, Mr. Obama’s
re-election campaign has emailed supporters to direct them to petitions.
“We’re
mobilizing on the ground all
month to get to 231,000 signatures because nothing is more fundamental
to our
democracy than the right to vote,” Greg Schultz, state director for the
Obama
campaign, wrote in one email.
“If
even one eligible Ohio voter can’t
cast a ballot in November, 2012, because of these new rules, because
the lines
were too long or they couldn’t get off work to make it to the polls in
time,
we’ll be asking ourselves if we did enough to prevent it from
happening,” he
wrote.
House
Bill 194 was passed solely with
Republican votes and was signed by Gov. John Kasich. Barring a
successful
referendum petition, the law will take effect Sept. 30 in time to
affect this
fall’s election as well as next year’s presidential election.
Among
its numerous provisions, the law
would:
Reduce
the time period for casting
absentee ballots from 35 days before the election to 21 days.
Reduce
the time period for casting
such ballots in person to 17 days before the election with the window
closing
at 6 p.m. on the Friday before the election. No in-person early voting
would be
allowed on Sundays.
Prohibit
county boards of elections
from mass-mailing applications for absentee ballots to all registered
voters, a
practice preferred in the past by urban counties such as Lucas.
Postpone
the date of next year’s
primary election to May from March, a recognition that new
Census-adjusted maps
for congressional and state legislative districts have yet to be
adopted.
President
Barack Obama addresses the
national convention of the American Legion. Tuesday, Aug. 30, 2011, in
Minneapolis. President Barack Obama addresses the national convention
of the
American Legion. Tuesday, Aug. 30, 2011, in Minneapolis. ASSOCIATED
PRESS
Enlarge
Eliminate
the prior legal mandate that
a poll worker in a multiprecinct polling place must direct an otherwise
qualified voter who goes to the wrong precinct table to the right
table. A
provisional ballot cast in the wrong precinct won’t be counted.
Republicans
have argued that the
changes were necessary to create a uniform system for all counties.
“The
Obama re-election machine sees an
opportunity to suppress the votes of suburban and rural counties where
Republicans typically fare better than Democrats …” Ohio Republican
Party
Chairman Kevin DeWine said. “That’s a big part of what’s playing out in
Cuyahoga County, where they’re mailing out absentee ballot
applications.”
“We’re
finding that most counties in
the state aren’t able to do that,” he said. “It seems the large urban
counties
where Obama ran up the numbers in 2008 are the ones clamoring to send
out
absentee ballots. This is clearly not an effort looking at 2011, but at
2012 to
suppress the votes.”
With
the law’s future in doubt,
Secretary of State Jon Husted, a Republican last week issued his own
directive
prohibiting the mass mailing of absentee ballot applications by boards
of
election.
That
resulted in a showdown with
Cuyahoga County, where its new executive, Ed FitzGerald, a Democrat,
opted to
pay for the mailings out of his own budget, sidestepping the directive
affecting the elections board.
A
study by the University of Akron’s
Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics of early voting in Ohio
showed that
early voting in the 2010 gubernatorial election favored incumbent
Democratic
Gov. Ted Strickland.
He
received 52.8 percent of the early
vote cast.
But
in the end Republican John Kasich
won the election, receiving 51.4 percent of the larger vote that turned
out on
Election Day.
In
that race, 25.8 percent of the
total votes were cast prior to Election Day.
“This
is an issue all over the
country,” said John Green, the Bliss Institute’s executive director.
“Republican-led legislatures in many states have passed similar kinds
of
election-law changes. It’s a national debate about what’s more
important, the
integrity of the ballot or greater access to the ballot.
“People
who want integrity are willing
to sacrifice a little access to the ballot,” he said. “ … People who
are really
interested in access are willing to sacrifice a little integrity. … It
depends
on where one’s values are located.”
Read
it at the Toledo Blade
|