Rasmussen
Bigger government is better
What They Told Us: Reviewing Last Week’s Key Polls
Saturday, December 15, 2012 

38% Say U.S. Heading in Right Direction

Generic Congressional Ballot: Democrats 46%, Republicans 36%

29% Say US Economy is Getting Better 

Since Election Day, the number of voters who like the idea of bigger government is up, but most still have the opposite view. 

One-in-three Likely U.S. Voters (34%) now prefer a larger government with more services and higher taxes to one with fewer services and lower taxes. That's the highest level of support for bigger government we have ever measured. Most voters (56%), however, still favor smaller government. 

Only 37% of voters now say they are conservative when it comes to fiscal issues such as taxes and government spending. That’s the first time that number has ever dipped below 40%. Thirty-nine percent (39%) consider themselves fiscally moderate. One-in-five (20%) now say they are fiscally liberal. More voters than ever describe themselves as socially liberal, too.

However, fiscal conservatives won a big victory last week when Michigan became the 24th right to work state despite angry protests from the president and organized labor. Nationally, voters by a two-to-one margin think right-to-work laws are good for a state economically. 

Voters still cherish our nation’s freedoms. Eighty-five percent (85%) think Freedom of Speech is Very Important while 75% say the same about Freedom of Religion. Freedom of the Press and the Right to Bear Arms enjoy less support but are still seen as important. 

At the same time, voters are now evenly divided over whether the federal government protects or threatens their constitutional liberties. 

There are striking partisan differences on this question, though. Seventy-five percent (75%) of Democrats think the government is a protector of individual rights. The identical percentage (75%) of Republicans and 55% of unaffiliated voters feel the federal government is a threat to those rights. This echoes other surveys that show Democrats like the idea of bigger government a lot more than Republicans and unaffiliated voters do, as Scott Rasmussen explains in a recent radio update. 

However, the resistance to the president’s health care law continues to be strong. Scott Rasmussen argues in his latest weekly newspaper column that the law “is still fighting for its life.” While legal and political resistance continues, he explains that “the biggest challenge is more basic. Voters want more control over their own health care choices than either the status quo or the president’s law allows. 

One area of resistance is that only 17 states have agreed to set up their own health insurance exchanges. Policy makers in Washington had assumed that every state would jump on board. That new reality puts a much heavier burden on the federal government. Fewer than half of all voters nationwide want their state to set up its own health care exchange and voters are split as to whether their Governor should help with implementation. 

Just 46% of voters have a favorable opinion of the law.  As they have from the beginning, voters tend to expect that the law will hurt the quality of care while increasing both the cost of care and federal deficit. Seventy-three percent (73%) think the law is likely to cost more than official estimates. 

In addition to skepticism about the health care law, voters continue to overwhelmingly believe that cutting government spending would be good for the economy. This desire for spending cuts comes at a time when 50% of voters are worried the government will not do enough to help the economy. That’s the highest level of support yet measured for government action. Results like these are sometimes used to claim that voters are looking for a bigger government role. However, that is not consistent with the data. In fact, even among those who would like the government to do more, 59% want to see cuts in government spending. 

Government spending in America has increased every year since 1954. In his book, The People’s Money, Scott Rasmussen shows how voters are far more willing than their politicians to make fundamental changes in both national security and entitlement spending. 

Still, the president has kept targeted spending cuts on the back burner in negotiations to avoid the January 1 “fiscal cliff” of big across-the-board tax hikes and spending cuts and is winning the public relations battle over congressional Republicans. His job approval ratings remain near record highs in the daily Presidential Tracking Poll. 

Fifty-two percent (52%) of voters view the auto bailouts as a good move until they’re told the government lost billions bailing out General Motors and Chrysler. Then they’re evenly divided. 

In this weekend’s edition of Scott Rasmussen’s new television show, What America Thinks, he talks to conservative activist Grover Norquist whose anti-tax pledge is seen by many in Washington as the big obstacle preventing a fiscal cliff deal. Norquist contends that the pledge will save voters and congressional Republicans form mistakes the GOP has made in the past. Scott is also joined by Emily Tisch Sussman, executive director of Young Democrats of America, and Guy Benson, political editor of TownHall.com, to discuss social issues and the youth vote. 

Democrats hold a 10-point lead over Republicans – 46% to 36% - on the Generic Congressional Ballot. This is the fifth week in a row that the Democrats have led on the ballot and the second straight week they have enjoyed a double digit lead. 

Consumer and investor confidence changed little following last week’s jobs report but remains just below the highest levels of the past four years. 

Thirty-eight percent (38%) believe the US is generally heading in the right direction. That’s down five points from the week leading up to the election but up 19 points from a year ago. 

Most Americans remain worried about inflation, and 68% expect to be paying even more for groceries than they are paying now.  Fewer than half of Americans remain confident in the stability of the nation's banks. 

Read the rest of the article at Rasmussen