Foxnews...
As
Keystone
pipeline decision looms, White House suggests deadline is too soon
By Doug
McKelway
January 15,
2012
Another
all-but-certain battle over the fate of the Keystone XL pipeline is
fast
approaching as the White House signals resistance to a new Feb. 21
deadline for
approval of the project and interest groups step up their campaigns.
The White
House agreed to the new deadline as a part of Republican language
inserted in
the recently passed payroll tax cut extension, but with that deadline
now
looming, the White House appears hesitant to meet it.
“The State
Department has been very clear that that does not allow for the kinds
of
reviews that are necessary,” White House spokesman Jay Carney said last
week of
the fast approaching deadline.
The State
Department has the final say in approval of the pipeline because it
crosses
international borders. It has been reviewing the proposal for three
years.
Pipeline
supporters say that several environmental reviews of the proposed
pipeline have
already been conducted and that the White House is stonewalling under
competing
pressures from two of its core constituencies -- on one hand big labor,
which
wants a piece of the thousands of jobs the pipeline would bring, and
environmentalists
on the other hand, who abhor the further reliance on fossil fuels that
the
pipeline would bring.
To pressure
the White House, congressional Republicans and their allies in the oil
industry
-- headed by the American Petroleum Institute -- have begun a media
campaign in
support of the pipeline.
An ad run
by API begins with the voice of a narrator saying Obama “promised,”
followed by
a statement from the president that he “will do whatever it takes to
put this
economy back on track.”
The narration
continues: “Now is his chance. The Keystone XL pipeline is ready to be
built
bringing energy from Canada to power our country safely and responsibly
and
employing thousands immediately.”
A similar
video is now running on the website of House Speaker John Boehner. It
features
a music soundtrack and written text which reads, “If you were president
in a
struggling economy, burdened with excessive regulation and debt, and
you had
the chance to help create thousands of new jobs, all you had to do was
approve
a jobs project funded entirely with private investment, proposed more
than
three years ago, passed environmental reviews, preferred by your own
State
Department, strong bipartisan support in Congress, what would you do?”
Environmentalists
have accused Boehner of investing $10,000 to $50,000 each in several
different
firms that have a stake in Canadian oil sands. Boehner’s spokesman
Michael
Steel said in a recent interview that Boehner’s financial adviser
chooses his
investments so “there’s no conflict of interest on this or any other
investment.”
At the same
time, North Dakota Republican Sen. John Hoeven, a pipeline supporter
who
delivered the party’s weekly address on Saturday, has written
legislation that
would allow Congress to approve the pipeline, even if the Obama
administration
rejects it.
He
dismissed the White House contention that the deadline next month does
not
permit enough time for environmental review.
“Nothing
could be further from the truth,” Hoeven said. “Our bill puts no time
limit
whatsoever on the administration’s ability to review and set the
pipeline’s
route through Nebraska, which was the only area of contention left.”
Environmentalists
are confident that the State Department will reject the pipeline given
what
they believe is the narrow timeframe for review. They plan a Capitol
Hill rally
later this month targeting congressional supporters of the pipeline.
Canadian
Prime Minister Stephen Harper has promised that he would consider
selling oil
from Canadian tar sands to Asian customers if the U.S. rejects the
North
American route.
See the
story and the video, along with other stories, at Foxnews
|