Federal
News Radio
Lawmakers
to budget committee: Don't throw feds under the bus
Monday
- 12/9/2013
By
Jack Moore
Lawmakers,
who face a self-imposed Friday deadline to come up with a fiscal 2014
budget plan, appear to be making progress toward a limited deal that
would stave off another shutdown and give agencies the certainty of
funding for the remainder of the year.
But
lawmakers with districts surrounding Washington, D.C., are
preemptively speaking out against any proposal that, in the words of
Rep. Frank Wolf (R-Va.), would "throw federal employees under
the bus."
According
to the latest developments, Rep. Paul (R-Wis.) and Sen. Patty Murray
(D- Wash.) are nearing a deal to replace some of the sequestration
cuts over the next two years. As it currently stands, the measure
would add increased discretionary funding for fiscal 2014 from $967
billion to about $1.07 trillion — with the added $40 billion being
split evenly between Defense and nondefense spending, according to
National Journal's latest reading of the tea leaves. The topline
funding level would increase by another $25 billion in fiscal 2015.
Retirement
changes still part of the deal?
However,
still up in the air are potential changes to federal employees'
retirement benefits.
A
proposal to require federal employees, who typically contribute 0.8
percent of their salary toward their defined-benefit pensions, to set
aside an extra 1.2 percent phased in over three years is reportedly
part of the mix. Under the Federal Employees Retirement System,
employees also are required to contribute to Social Security and can
make voluntary contributions to their 401(k)-style Thrift Savings
Plan accounts.
Wolf
wrote to Ryan and Murphy last week saying that too often in the past
federal employees' pay and benefits have "been used as pawns in
budget negotiations."
In an
interview on In Depth with Francis Rose, Wolf said his letter had a
simple message: "Stop picking on federal employees, and stop
letting them be the target every time you try to find budget
savings," he explained.
Wolf
said federal employees have already sacrificed enough: a three-year
pay freeze, sequestration-related furloughs over the summer and the
recent government shutdown.
"Every
time they come to a budget crunch, the only place they go is with
regard to federal employees," he said. "And you're talking
about FBI agents who are over in Nairobi, who are investigating the
bombing of the shopping center there. You have people that were
working at the Navy Yard. ... You have people at NIH, people who are
working on cancer cures. You have all these people who have been hit
very, very hard. They're the one segment that's been hit over and
over and over. And that's not the place to go now."
Other
lawmakers also speaking out
Wolf's
complaint has been echoed from several other lawmakers with large
federal- employee constituencies, including Sens. Barbara Mikulski
(D-Md.), the chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and Ben
Cardin (D-Md.), who was tasked by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
(D-Nev.) with apprising the Senate of federal-workforce issues.
In a
Dec. 4 letter, Mikulski called on the budget conference committee to
reject "draconian proposals" requiring federal employees to
cough up more from their paychecks for their retirement benefits.
"Requiring
federal employees to pay substantially more for their retirement
would again make them the scapegoats of deficit reduction,"
Mikulski said.
Cardin
requested the Congressional Research Service issue a report on the
impacts of recent deficit-reduction efforts on federal employees' pay
and retirement benefits. In addition to extending the pay freeze
through the end of 2013 and sequestration-caused furloughs, Congress
last year also passed legislation requiring federal workers hired
after January 2013 to contribute 3.1 percent of their salary toward
their pensions as an offset for a temporary extension of the payroll
tax holiday.
Cardin:
Don't use feds as piggybank
But
Cardin said after that legislation passed, there was an agreement
that "federal workers would not serve as a 'piggybank' again,
especially for shorter term budget deals," he wrote in a Dec. 6
letter to Reid and Murray.
"No
other group of predominantly middle-class Americans has contributed
to deficit reduction the way federal workers have," the letter
stated. "This relentless attack isn't just devastating to
workforce morale; it's hurting our country and our economy."
The
Congressional Budget Office advised the committee in a report issued
last month that hiking feds' retirement contributions would yield $19
billion over the next decade in increased federal revenue.
The
issue has appeal across party lines. The measure being considered by
the budget committee — increasing contributions by 1.2 percent over
three years — is identical to an idea included in President Barack
Obama's 2014 budget proposal. Meanwhile, House Republicans have
approved even stiffer increases in their chamber's annual spending
blueprints.
But
Wolf is bucking the trend.
"If
the Obama administration wants to throw federal employees under the
bus, I don't agree with them," Wolf said, adding that Obama
risks undermining the federal workforce by supporting the proposal.
"He
is the leader of the federal employees," Wolf said. "He
should be their strongest champion. And so the fact that he thinks
it's OK certainly doesn't raise my comfort level — and I don't
think it raises the comfort level for anybody else. I don't care who
else is for it. This is the wrong place to go."
Read
this and other articles at Federal News Radio
|