|
|
Getty Images/iStockphoto
Zanesville Times Recorder
More Ohio
schools arm teachers to shoot attackers
Adrian Burns
November 12, 2016
The next person to be shot in an Ohio school could be at the hands of a
teacher allowed to carry a gun.
In a trend that has grown rapidly since the late 2012 school shooting
at Sandy Hook Elementary School, an increasing number of school
districts around Ohio have authorized teachers and school staff members
to carry concealed firearms in classrooms.
But which schools allow armed teachers, or which teachers volunteer to
be armed, across Ohio is not known. Details of the policies are legally
allowed to be secret and some districts do little to let the public
know such a policy has even been enacted. But expert estimates put the
number of districts arming staff members at more than 175, or more than
one in four districts in the state.
The surge in such policies is significant for Ohio students, parents
and for those who work in schools. Some view allowing the concealed
carry of firearms at schools as a major boost to staff and student
safety. If a child or other perpetrator goes on a shooting spree, an
armed teacher can kill the shooter before more lives are lost. Others
flatly oppose the measures — citing a raft of concerns including the
potential for accidents, potential confusion over distinguishing a
shooter from a staff member and worries that armed staff members are
ill-trained to manage the authority to take a life during a crisis.
“Five years ago we probably wouldn’t have considered it, and even three
or two years ago I would still have been saying this is not the
direction we want to go,” said David Hire, Superintendent of Coshocton
City Schools, who hopes to have armed staff members in his schools by
year end. “But we’re living in a society where this is becoming almost
weekly or every other week where there is some event somewhere around
the country.”
School policies in Ohio on guns vary. Districts have long been allowed
by state law to authorize specific staff members such as teachers,
custodians or administrators to carry concealed weapons. Few, if any,
districts were known to have done so — until the Dec. 2012 Sandy Hook
shooting, when 20 children and six adults were fatally shot by a gunman
in Connecticut.
Following that incident, the Columbus-based Buckeye Firearms
Association, which advocates for gun ownership and fewer gun control
laws, began more actively promoting the arming of school staff, along
with spearheading a training program for school employees who want to
carry concealed firearms in schools. The West Union-based Tactical
Defense Institute, funded by the Buckeye Firearms Foundation, said that
it has trained staff members from 175 districts around the state to
carry concealed firearms.
As more schools have adopted such measures, district administrators
have begun to get more comfortable with the notion of arming school
staff, said Hire, who estimates as many as 200 districts in the state
have adopted the firearms measures. Hire said he expects that number to
continue to grow.
“It has always been the thinking that we don’t need to go in this
direction,” Hire said. “But I said I’m so impressed with the quality of
the training and what they are learning that I think this is something
we need to talk about.”
There is no official list of which Ohio schools allow school staff to
carry concealed weapons, and it isn’t always easy to find out if such
policies are in place. School districts are required to adopt policies
in public school board meetings, but Ohio law gives districts the
ability to keep much about arming staff members secret because school
security plans aren’t public. That can lead to some schools disclosing
their approach, and others staying mum.
The Zanesville City Schools District for example, adopted a concealed
firearms policy in a public meeting in June, but at East Muskingum
Local Schools, the neighboring district to the east, parents and
students are kept in the dark on whether staff members are carrying
guns or not.
“As protected by the law, school safety plans are not public record,”
Superintendent Jill Sheridan said in an email inquiring as to whether
the school district has adopted a policy to arm its staff.
West Muskingum Local Schools reports that it has no plans to put a
policy in place allowing concealed firearms.
Many school superintendents, however, are quick to say they don’t
support arming school staff members.
“As far as a lethal response, with a gun, we’re not comfortable with it
here,” said Colonel Crawford Local Schools Superintendent Todd Martin,
whose schools are near Bucyrus.
He said he is an avid supporter of the right to bear arms, holds a
concealed carry permit and carries a gun when he’s not at school. Plus,
he was stabbed during a hostage situation with a student in 2007.
Despite that incident, and his experience with firearms, Martin said he
still is against carrying guns in school, and personally doesn’t feel
qualified to draw a firearm to diffuse a school shooting incident.
“If I’m going to have a gun on the premises I’d rather have a resource
officer who has been trained,” Martin said. “If I’m going to defend
myself in the community, I’m not firing around potentially 1,000 kids
in classrooms and hallways.”
Colonel Crawford does not employ a resource officer — typically a sworn
local police officer who acts as a security guard for schools, but many
schools do. Liberty Union-Thurston Local Schools in Fairfield County
opted not to arm school staff members — instead the district made its
resource officer full time in 2015, said Superintendent Todd Osborn.
The officer provides an armed presence in the schools, but has also
become an important role model for students, he said.
“Kids feel comfortable going to him if there are problems, and we’ve
been able to get out in front of potential issues or to help kids when
things are happening at home, not even at the school,” Osborn said.
Concerns from the Baltimore Police Department that armed school staff
might be mistaken for an active shooter were one reason the district
didn’t move forward with a concealed carry policy, Osborn said.
Schools often pay the salaries of resource officers, but arming staff
members is usually a much cheaper route as existing employees are
already being paid to perform their normal duties and typically
purchase their own firearms.
Arming school staff members is a decision each district has to make
based on its own needs and circumstances, said Dick Caster, the school
safety and security consultant for the Ohio School Boards Association.
“I have 35 years in public school administration in some capacity and
never did I think we would be arming staff,” he said. “When you talk
about arming staff, it’s kind of chilling but you cannot not have the
discussion.”
But for Hire, who said he never had much of an interest in guns, and
whose religious beliefs don’t align with carrying a firearm or taking a
life, the risk of a school shooting is just too high not to have armed
staff. The school also employs a resource officer.
“I’ve come full circle to say that I’m not going to allow someone to
take someone else’s life,” he said. “I feel a confidence about the
people that have gone through the training.”
Hire said he also got the support of the Coshocton County Sheriff’s
Office before moving ahead with a concealed-carry policy.
“I doubt we would have done anything if we didn’t have the blessing of
the sheriff,” he said.
Calls to Coshocton County Sheriff Tim Rogers were not returned.
Coshocton staff were trained by the Tactical Defense Institute during a
three-day class with extensive live-firing exercises, and training in
conflict resolution, medical trauma treatment and more, Hire said.
Training is crucial for armed staff members to be effective, said Joe
Eaton, who runs the institute.
“All you have to have is a concealed handgun license and permission
from the school board,” he said. “But most schools realize that getting
additional specialized training on these kind of events is necessary.”
Read this and other articles at the Zanesville Times Recorder
|
|
|
|
