U.S.
Senator Rob Portman
Weekly Column: Our Right to Bear
Arms
The
United States Senate is likely to take up gun control
legislation later this month in response to the tragic school shooting
in
Newtown, Connecticut. Unfortunately,
the
majority of the proposals that have surfaced would do nothing to
prevent these
types of horrific acts of violence from happening in the future. They would, however,
infringe on Second
Amendment rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
I
am a gun owner and avid hunter. Whether for protection,
recreation, competition, or to ensure our freedoms granted by the
Founders, I
continue to support “the right of the people to keep and bear arms…”
Both
sides of the gun control debate agree that we should work to
reduce gun violence through better enforcement of current gun laws,
enhancing
school security, and ensuring that those who suffer from mental
illness—a
common thread in these attacks—receive proper care. There is also a
growing recognition
of the need to address the root causes of violence in our society. There is more to be done
in each of these
areas. However,
many of the proposals
for additional gun control laws are misguided.
For
example, banning certain types of weapons based on cosmetic
characteristics does not reduce gun violence. The “assault weapons ban”
that
was in place between 1994 and 2004 had no measurable impact on gun
violence. In
fact, the number of homicides committed with guns today is lower than
when the
ban was in effect. I
opposed the
ban. I opposed
extending it in
2004. And I
continue to oppose it today.
Requiring
universal background checks on all firearm sales—called
for by President Obama and other gun control advocates—is similarly
flawed. Such a law
may sound attractive
at first, but a closer look reveals its flaws. First, we know that most
criminals obtain their firearms illegally.
Studies show that over 70% of guns used in
crimes were acquired through
illegal activities like theft or straw purchases.
Second, people who currently make false
statements on a background check in an attempt to purchase a firearm
are rarely
prosecuted. In
2010, there were 72,659
cases where the National Instant Criminal Background Check System
(NICS) denied
a person the right to purchase a firearm, many based on a past felony
conviction. Of
these cases, only 13
actually led to a conviction.
Third,
reporting on mental health information to the NICS is not adequate or
consistent, making background checks unreliable.
For example, 23 states have submitted less
than 100 mental health records and four states haven’t submitted any.
There
is also discussion of a new, national gun registry connected
with universal background checks. The Obama Administration’s Justice
Department
has said that the effectiveness of universal background checks “depends
on…requiring gun registration,” something I strongly oppose.
A
universal background check also comes at a cost. Such
legislation could force law-abiding citizens to get permission from the
government before selling firearms to friends or even handing them down
among
family members. These
types of laws
ultimately restrict the rights of legal gun owners without having any
measurable impact on gun violence.
In
addition to the threats to our Second Amendment rights from
within this country, we also must be aware of potential threats from
the United
Nations. Last
year, I joined 50 of my
colleagues in the U.S. Senate in sending a letter to President Obama
and then
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stating that a U.N. treaty
infringing on the
constitutional rights of American gun owners is unacceptable. I will
continue
to oppose the ratification of The U.N. Arms Trade Treaty and any treaty
that
restricts the rights of law-abiding Americans to manufacture, assemble,
possess, transfer, or purchase firearms, ammunition and related items.
I
remain committed to working with my colleagues to better enforce
existing gun laws and go after criminals.
For example, I support increasing penalties
for straw purchasers, and I
believe Congress should give law enforcement additional tools to go
after gun
traffickers. We
should also work to
improve the safety of our schools.
I
support the good work being done here in Ohio to provide appropriate
training
to teachers and administrators who have permission from their local
school
boards to carry. I
also support doing
more to help people who suffer from mental illnesses get the treatment
they
need and to ensure states are providing timely and accurate data for
background
checks.
But
proposed bills such as the assault weapons ban, further
limiting magazine capacity, and universal background checks would
infringe on
the rights of law-abiding citizens while doing little or nothing to
prevent gun
violence.
|