|
|
|
The views expressed on this page are soley
those of the author and do not
necessarily represent the views of County
News Online
|
 |
Education Dive
Conflicting
state, federal marijuana laws leave district policies in a haze
Amelia Harper
Feb. 13, 2019
Dive Brief:
Though medical marijuana use is now legal in 33 states and recreational
use has been legalized in 10 states and the District of Columbia,
marijuana is still classified as a Schedule I drug and illegal under
federal law — leaving schools in danger of losing federal funding under
the Drug-Free Workplace Act if educators use marijuana in any form,
according to U.S. News and World Report.
This disconnect between state and federal law is creating problems for
teachers who use marijuana with a prescription or use it where it is
legal while they are on vacation, because that use shows up in drug
tests. And while at least six states have enacted laws to make it
easier for students to use medical marijuana, they have balked at
addressing the same issue for teachers because of the federal
ramifications.
While waiting for federal law to catch up with states, some legal
experts sees room for “creative solutions” to the problem, such as not
requiring drug tests for teachers unless they appear high, creating
more specific drug-free workplace policies outlining when it can be
used, treating positive tests for marijuana as a negative if the
employee has a medical marijuana license, or giving adequate notice
before drug tests are given.
Dive Insight:
With the legalization of marijuana use in a growing number of states,
school and district leaders are faced with decisions about how the
issue should be handled with students and teachers alike. The issue is
further complicated by the growing interest in CBD oil — a related
product that does not have all of the same side effects. While states
are taking steps to address the issue of medical marijuana
administration on the student level, handling it with teachers is more
complicated — not only because of federal workplace regulations, but
also because teachers are often considered role models for students.
To complicate matters further, some states are now taxing marijuana and
using the proceeds to support educational efforts. While this seems to
be providing another stream of revenue for education, it also creates a
mixed message for young people who are being warned about the dangers
of marijuana use on one hand and told that its sale supports education
on the other.
While the debate over the legalization of marijuana use wages on,
schools need to examine their drug-free workplace policies to see
whether they meet current federal laws and the laws in their state.
They also need to examine how legalization is affecting drug education
programs for students.
While marijuana use is one issue to consider, the growing opioid
epidemic, and the use of alcohol are also matters that can affect
teacher performance, attendance and judgment in the classroom, and
these also need to be addressed in policy discussions. Knowing where to
draw the line between protecting schools' and students’ interests and
protecting teacher rights is a challenge, and one that while likely
require local legal advice to sort out.
|
|
|
|
