|
|
|
The views expressed on this page are
solely
those of the author and do not
necessarily represent the views of County
News Online
|
|
Wikimedia Commons
Education Dive
Federal court clears way for new Title IX K-12 rule, takes effect Friday
Naaz Modan
Aug. 13, 2020
Dive Brief:
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled Wednesday in
favor of new Title IX rules requiring districts to significantly upend
sexual harassment and assault reporting processes. The rules are set to
take effect Friday (took effect Friday... editor).
The decision denied the request of 18 attorneys general from 17 states
and the District of Columbia for a preliminary injunction. It
acknowledged while the concerns may be sound, the court's role "is not
to substitute its judgment for that of the [U.S. Department of
Education]" and is not to ask "whether a regulatory decision is the
best one possible or even whether it is better than the alternatives."
The attorneys general challenged the new regulations in June, hoping to postpone implementation on the grounds that:
K-12 schools will be required to "completely overhaul their systems"
for sexual harassment complaints while COVID-19 has strained their
resources.
Putting in place new policies and procedures in three months is
impractical and not enough time to gather stakeholder input and garner
buy-in.
The rules fail to protect students from incidents of isolated sexual harassment like inappropriate touching.
The rules leave a gray area for K-12 schools, like how to protect the
privacy of those involved in the complaints and not being able to use
"sound forms of discipline" like detention or suspension before a
formal appeals process.
Dive Insight:
The new regulations, unveiled by U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy
DeVos in May, go into effect Aug. 14, while districts are reopening
school buildings in many places after months of COVID-19 closures. A
similar case filed by the New York City Department of Education
challenging the Title IX regulations was also denied earlier this week.
Starting Friday, schools will be required to respond to sexual
harassment allegations when any school employee has been notified by a
student, as opposed to DeVos' earlier proposal that limited those
employees to teachers. Institutions can be held liable if they fail to
respond to notices by bus drivers, coaches, cafeteria staff and others.
The attorneys general also argued the new rules require "hiring and
training staff, engaging in required consultation with stakeholders,
overhauling policies, revising grievance processes, and communicating
the complex changes to students, families, and employees — all in the
midst of [a] global pandemic that has depleted their resources and
disrupted their ordinary operations.”
And while districts may have to reallocate resources to implement the
rules, the court concluded those were not significant enough to result
in an injunction, despite the concerns of the attorneys general that
doing so would take away from the resources needed to navigate the
pandemic.
In its decision, the court said it "recognizes the obvious seriousness
of the COVID-19 pandemic" and acknowledged "the substantial additional
work burdening schools" as they approach a new school year. "In fact,
for these and other reasons, a later effective date might have been a
preferable policy decision," the opinion said.
Still, Judge Carl J. Nichols wrote in his opinion the Department of
Education took the pandemic and other concerns into consideration
during its rule-making process, making it unlikely its implementation
date was "arbitrary and capricious," as the attorneys general claimed
in their lawsuit.
The decision also said schools have "long been on notice" about the
final rule, referencing the proposed rules that were left open for
comment in 2017. While Nichols said "schools could not be expected to
actually change their policies in important ways based merely on a
proposed rule," schools were given "almost two years to analyze and
understand its requirements" and that the department's expectation is
not "unreasonable."
And while the new rules set a higher bar for incidents to be
investigated as sexual harassment under Title IX, the Ed Department
does not prevent schools from investigating and punishing conduct not
technically considered sexual harassment under the new definition — so
long as schools do not label those incidents as Title IX cases.
The department called the decision a "victory" in a press release sent
Wednesday afternoon, saying it can "now look forward to [the rules]
taking effect this Friday."
|
|
|
|
