|
|
|
The views expressed on this page are
solely
those of the author and do not
necessarily represent the views of County
News Online
|
|
Frederic J Brown/Getty
Newsweek
Defying Trump, Schools Edge Towards Remote Learning
By Linda Jacobson
7/16/20
This article was published in cooperation with The74million.org.
Back in April, when New York and New Jersey were blowing up like Sodom
and Gomorrah, California Governor Gavin Newsom was golden. Despite
being one of the first states to record cases of COVID-19, California's
outbreak seemed to be well under control. Newsom was optimistic enough
to announce a phased reopening that included sending kids back to
school in July. "We recognize there's been a learning loss because of
this disruption," he said at a news briefing, reported by the Los
Angeles Times. "You can either, you know, roll over and just accept
that or you can do something about it."
July is here, and the coronavirus clearly has other plans, not just for
California but also for the nation. With COVID-19 cases soaring, the
Los Angeles Unified School District, the nation's second largest, will
not be opening its doors to its roughly 600,000 students now or in the
fall. Neither will San Diego and Atlanta. As teachers and their unions
fret over safety and forlorn administrators rummage for viable
re-opening plans, it's looking increasingly like many of the nation's
school districts will go the same way.
Parents, teachers and superintendents are apparently responding to a
different reality than President Trump ("SCHOOLS MUST OPEN IN THE
FALL!!!") or Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, who has threatened to
withhold federal funds to districts that remain shuttered. "There is no
way in this world that it's going to be safe to go back to school,"
says Adriana Ruiz, a mother of five in Cudahy, California. "I worked so
hard these past few months to keep them safe from this virus, and I'm
expected to send them back?"
As new cases of COVID-19 rise at an alarming rate throughout the Sun
Belt and states like Texas and Florida that re-opened businesses early
are considering new lockdowns, school districts are beset by
conflicting messages and interests. The odds of a significant number of
U.S. schools fully opening in the fall now appear slight, and those
that do re-open will probably combine remote learning with limited
classroom attendance. Parents, it seems, are going to have to make
plans to cope with having the kids at home at least part of the time
through the end of the year, and possibly longer.
One of the main arguments for re-opening in the fall is that other
nations have successfully done it—Trump has cited Norway, Denmark,
Germany and Sweden as examples. But with the exception of Sweden, those
countries locked down earlier than the U.S., and the prevalence of the
coronavirus in their populations is far lower. Even so, their schools
have not fully re-opened—they are still coping with split schedules and
instruction in small groups. (Sweden is a special case: Its schools,
like the rest of the country, never closed down, and as a result it has
had more infections and deaths than its neighbors; there has been
little evidence that schools contributed to the outbreak.)
Studies suggest that young children are the least vulnerable to
COVID-19 and that classrooms do not constitute large infection risks.
But the data is not considered definitive and the real-world experience
so far is mixed. When schools in Denmark, Germany, and Austria
reopened, the infection rate did not go up, possibly because younger
children's less-developed immune systems don't allow "the virus to
attach as easily," says Eva Schernhammer, an epidemiologist at the
University of Vienna.
But, she says, as long as new cases are climbing, it "may not be
advisable" to send children back to school. Israel's experience
provides a dismal warning of what could happen if schools brush aside
advice from public health experts and fully reopen. After the country
lifted its lockdown, it opened classrooms to children in the primary
grades, teaching them in small groups, or "capsules," while the higher
grades worked remotely.
Then, in mid-May, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered all schools
to resume normal operations. Two weeks later, outbreaks began
increasing. One school had 130 cases, according to scientists who
studied re-openings in many countries. Health officials have linked the
decision to reopen schools to rising cases across the country. Since
June, cases have been climbing, and this week the country began to see
some of its worst infection rates since the pandemic began.
Now education officials in the country are making plans to re-open with
flexible schedules, according to Rami Benbenishty, a professor emeritus
at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, whose brother is a high school
principal. One model being considered is bringing students into the
building and allowing teachers to teach from home. "This allows the
concentration of technology in school, rather than addressing the needs
of a large number of students," he says.
The best-supported argument for opening schools concerns the lower
grades—from kindergarten to second grade—as well as students learning
English and those with special needs. These children have lost the most
since March and are least likely to thrive in a virtual classroom.
Districts are already facing lawsuits because they haven't been able to
provide all the services for special needs students that were agreed to
with families before school closures.
"Those are recommendations that science would support us making," said
Philip Fisher, a psychology professor at the University of Oregon, who
conducts a weekly survey of the pandemic's impact on families with
young children. "Groups facing the greatest inequalities need the
support more. It's justifiable, whether people like it or not."
There's no consensus among experts that opening for these kids would be
safe. In South Korea, which has a lower level of coronavirus in
circulation than the U.S. does, elementary school students only attend
school once a week because officials decided they were the least likely
to social distance and attend to personal hygiene.
So far in the U.S. only rural districts in mountain states like Idaho,
Wyoming and Montana have reopened during the pandemic. But the lessons
they offer for the rest of the country are likely meager. In Montana,
the 12 districts that fully reopened on May 7 each have fewer than 50
students, which makes maintaining the recommended distance between them
less of a challenge than it does for bigger urban schools.
Schools will likely follow a hodgepodge of policies in the fall. In
Florida, despite rising infections, the education commissioner joined
the president in ordering schools to reopen with students in
classrooms. School boards across Arizona, a COVID-19 hotspot, are
petitioning the governor to delay opening until October; one district
in Phoenix has gone ahead and announced that it was going to hold off
for a few months And New York City schools, the nation's largest
system, will proceed with a blended model in which roughly half the
normal number of students will be allowed in the buildings while the
rest stay at home.
Having many children learning from home will place a burden on parents
and on the economy. Working parents comprise about one-third of the
American workforce. Until they can fully resume the work schedules they
had before schools and child care programs shut down, it will be
difficult to jumpstart the economy, according to Nicole Bateman with
the Brookings Institution. There have also been signs that in
two-parent homes, working mothers have been working less hours while
the fathers continue working full time, further contributing to loss of
income. While the unemployment rate has bounced back slightly since
May, school closures could bring it back up again.
Families have grown increasingly concerned over evictions and whether
they can afford basic necessities. Data released Tuesday from Parents
Together, a 2 million member parent organization, shows that 45 percent
of families are somewhat or very concerned about losing their home, and
more than half said they were only able to cover their rent or mortgage
in April because they cut back on other essentials.
Whatever districts decide to do, school leaders are caught in a bind.
"We are being asked to do the impossible," said Susan Enfield,
superintendent of the Highline Public Schools, a 19,600-student
district south of Seattle. "I have an enormous square peg that I'm
trying to squeeze into a microscopic round hole. There are no great
scenarios here."
For every socially distanced attendance plan her staff develops, they
can think of multiple reasons why it wouldn't work. They initially
proposed an approach that put many of the most vulnerable students,
including the youngest children, in buildings four days a week. But
that runs the risk of "losing young adolescents in droves," she said.
"We believe every one of our kids is going to have to have that
in-person contact."
She wants to start translating some of these models on paper to help
"people picture what it could look like" and give teachers time for
practicing the new routine in the building.
And then?
"Once we land on the least bad option," she said. "We have to sell it
like nobody's business for our kids. That third grader, this is the
only year they get to be a third grader."
|
|
|
|
