|
|
|
The views expressed on this page are
solely
those of the author and do not
necessarily represent the views of County
News Online
|
|
Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images
The 74 Million
As
Coronavirus Cases Surge, New Antibody Study Shows Young Children May Be
Less Likely to Spread Virus; Could Spell Good News for In-Person
Elementary and Middle School Learning
November 18
A new study continues to build the case that the risks of in-person
learning for elementary and middle school students may be lower than
many officials originally feared, but comes just as surging coronavirus
cases nationwide are prompting multiple districts to delay reopening.
The paper, published in the journal Nature Immunology, examined 47
youth and 32 adults who had been infected with the virus, finding a
reduced antibody response among children. Counterintuitively, this
result is good news for kids, as it indicates that COVID often did not
take hold as strongly within children’s systems and seems to offer a
scientific counterpoint to the highly politicized debates over school
reopenings during the pandemic.
This past week, however, the pandemic has risen to crisis levels across
much of the nation. Reaching an alarming record of 160,000 new cases on
Thursday only a week after first hitting 100,000 in a single day,
hospitals are now warning of dwindling bed spaces and rationing care.
Where conditions are most dire, like in El Paso, Texas, coroners are
deploying mobile morgues.
The spread of the virus has prompted many school systems — especially
urban districts such as Philadelphia, San Diego, and Washington, D.C. —
to push back reopening plans. Boston and Chicago remain closed and the
spike has brought New York City schools, the largest in the country and
one of the few big city districts to reopen for in-person learning, to
announce a second school shutdown on Wednesday.
Beyond the current third wave, however, districts will have to confront
bringing students back and the Nature Immunology study’s results may
augur well for younger students returning to the classroom first.
“It does suggest that … as long as extensive precautions are taken,
in-person learning may be possible,” Dr. Donna Farber, an immunologist
at Columbia University and a co-author of the study, told The 74.
The paper helps put the pieces together on a number of previously
unknown questions surrounding school reopenings. First and foremost, it
helps explain why young children seem to transmit COVID less than
adults. The lessened antibody responses observed by Farber’s team
indicate that the virus rarely gains the same foothold in children as
it tends to in those who are older. That has implications for
transmission.
“If they really don’t have a lot of virus, they’re not going to be
breathing out a lot of virus,” Farber explained. “They’re not going to
be the big spreaders, the big super spreaders.”
This conclusion aligns with the friendly stances a number of prominent
public health experts have recently taken toward school reopenings,
particularly when weighed against the demonstrated harm distance
learning has had on students, especially the most vulnerable. Earlier
this month in an interview with Education Week, Dr. Ashish Jha, dean of
Brown University’s School of Public Health, said that “schools need to
be bolder” in their reopening strategies, given the proper safety
measures. Jha has also spoken out on Twitter about the
oft-overestimated risk of in-person learning. And last month, The
Atlantic published an article arguing that fears that schools would be
COVID “super-spreaders” were likely overblown.
But the decision to risk exposure to the coronavirus through reopening
schools is tricky, and the Nature Immunology paper helps build the case
that health risks may tend to vary by student age, a concept described
by experts as a “gradient in infectiousness.” This differential
response stems from the way human immune systems develop.
“School-age children, they’re designed to respond to new pathogens efficiently,” said Farber.
She explained that younger kids produce cells called “new T-cells” that
respond when germs previously unseen to the body enter their system.
Adults on the other hand rely on “memory T-cells,” meaning they protect
themselves based on the pathogens with which their immune systems are
already familiar. Additionally, kids tend to be exposed to a vastly
greater number of common colds than adults, many of which are caused by
other coronaviruses, which could also help them block COVID-19,
according to another new study. But during high school, immune
responses tend to change.
“When you’re an immunological adult is probably less than 18,” said
Farber, providing some intuition on why COVID outbreaks could be more
likely in the upper grades and have been rampant in college-age
settings.
That’s precisely how observed cases have played out. According to data
on 200,000 school students across 47 U.S. states gathered by economist
Emily Oster at Brown University, incidence of the virus was highest in
high school students, followed by those in middle school and then
elementary school.
The findings and the observed data are good news for districts such as
New Orleans; Palm Beach County, Florida; and Charlotte-Mecklenburg,
North Carolina who pursued phased reopening plans prioritizing the
return of their youngest students for in-person learning. While these
decisions were largely based on the difficulty of educating
elementary-aged students remotely, the mounting evidence suggests that
the science may also be on their side — even when it comes to
asymptomatic carriers of the virus.
Doctors and school officials alike have worried that youth who are
infected by COVID but do not experience symptoms could come to school
and spread the virus inadvertently. And while that risk remains, the
findings of the Nature Immunology study indicate that asymptomatic
carriers may be less likely to spread the virus than those who
experience symptoms.
“If the kids are able to control the virus so well, then their
asymptomatic (infection) may correlate with that they’re actually not
producing a lot of virus. And if they’re not producing a lot of virus,
they’re not going to be able to transmit it as well,” said Farber, who
also cautioned that the window of greatest danger for infecting others
may be right as symptoms are beginning to develop.
Even after the announcement that a coronavirus vaccine may be closer
than previously believed, questions remain about its effectiveness and
the speed at which it will be distributed once it becomes available. As
the country hits new highs in positive cases and deaths, districts may
not be able to bank on a vaccine making their choices easier.
|
|
|
|
